Originally posted by IR0NFIST
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostSo you believe USADA is lying about knowing beforehand about the IV
In order to defend USADA you would have to argue that there is no supporting documentation because USADA did not follow WADA rules regarding TUEs. Such an argument sinks Maweather and USADA because it invalidates the TUE. Damned if you do damned if you dont.Last edited by GTTofAK; 09-15-2015, 04:58 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by el*** View PostNSAC doesnt have to issue an exemption for the IV, since it wasnt in violation of their rules in the first place. It was against USADA/WADA rules, so how would they grant an exception for someone elses rules?
NSAC makes no sense here.
"I have specifically articulated and memorialized to USADA that [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a the****utic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada", Bennett said.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GTTofAK View PostI know for a fact that USADA will lie. As such I cannot accept anything they say without some corresponding evidence. As they have supplied absolutely 0 evidence to support their claim that they were informed before the IV and taken in context with WADA's strict rules on documentation of TUE's and the existing documentation I have to conclude given the evidence that it is more likely than not that USADA is again lying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostAgain, you are believing what you want only if it suits your agenda. You believe USADA is telling the truth when they say Mayweather took an IV, but not when they say they knew about it beforehand. You wouldn't even know about the IV if USADA didn't release it publicly. So USADA is credible if it suits your agenda, and liars when it doesn't suit your agenda. Fine work there.
Comment
-
Floyd took IV infusion May 1st after the weigh in true or false?
USADA did not caught Floyd in the act of administering the IV true or false?
USADA did not inform NSAC about this true or false?
which one is true
Floyd applied for TUE 30 days prior or
Floyd applied for TUE after USADA found out he took IV transfusion
Floyd fans said Floyd was tested before and after the IV transfusion
Floyd from official USADA records showed he was blood tested April 21 and last tested May 2 a day after the transfusion true or false?
If Floyd medical team of memo and ariza administered IV transfusion on May 1st after the weigh in and applied TUE after that did he broke the rules that you can not administer IV transfusion without an approved TUE?
If Floyd applied for TUE before they administer the IV transfusion because the reason that they gave was he was dehydrated, how come Floyd knows before hand that he will be dehydrated on that said date?
if Floyd was dehydrated @146lbs vs Pac was he dehydrated @146lbs vs Berto?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostThe only supporting evidence that he took an IV is information that came directly from USADA.
There is also this big legal term called motive to lie. I can believe USADA about the IV being administered because there is no motive to lie. This is all very simple legal and evidentiary practice but far beyond your simple brain.
You are not that smart please trying to pretend that you are smart. You are not you are ******. The Spartans would have thrown your dumbass off the mountain.Last edited by GTTofAK; 09-15-2015, 05:08 PM.
Comment
Comment