True or False: James Toney's win over Michael Nunn is better than any win of Floyd's?

[No Tomorrow]

People need to understand that Michael Nunn at that time was on another stratosphere and was being touted as the MW Muhammad Ali. And a bout between him and Sugar Ray Leonard was constantly being floated as an idea in the late '80's.

This shouldn't be a debate. This win is a much better win than any of Floyd's.

Go watch Michael Nunn vs Frank Tate and simply use your eyes to see that Floyd has not faced that level of talent

[No Tomorrow]

There you go. No excuse now to think otherwise

[Pac=Duran]

Was Floyd?

Childish insults also imply you're a wee bit upset.

Childish insults of a man that is nowhere near the argument lol what does it matter? Just injecting a bit of humour into things.

The peak of defensive fighters is difficult to ascertain. Fighters like Pac that rely on speed and athleticism peak and fade far earlier than say a B-Hop or a Mayweather.

[Pac=Duran]

There you go. No excuse now to think otherwise

Nunn's evasiveness Holy Shlt!

[Robbie Barrett]

There you go. No excuse now to think otherwise

Why watch that when you can just watch the Toney fight which Nunn was winning easily before getting caught.

[Johnwoo8686]

Was Nunn the second best boxer on the planet when Toney beat him?

He has a point though. Pacquiao may not have been at his peak (neither was Floyd) but he was regarded and ranked far more highly than Michael Nunn. So Pacquiao was the better win.

Doesn't matter if he was at his peak or not, he was still regarded as the second best boxer on the planet. Was Nunn? Simple question.

Watch this guy duck this question lol. They always evade certain points to continue to make their argument.

[b00g13man]

Childish insults of a man that is nowhere near the argument lol what does it matter? Just injecting a bit of humour into things.

Makes no sense like most of your posts, but that's whatever.

The peak of defensive fighters is difficult to ascertain. Fighters like Pac that rely on speed and athleticism peak and fade far earlier than say a B-Hop or a Mayweather.

Have you actually bothered to watch any Floyd fights? You can't tell that he's clearly not the same fighter? You might want to switch to a different sport if you can't see the difference.

[Pac=Duran]

Watch this guy duck this question lol. They always evade certain points to continue to make their argument.

Pac was considered Number 2 in the world for sure, but it was a shell of the Pac of the late 2000s. But the question is if Floyd has a better win than Toney's over Nunn.

Here's a question for you: Was Pac a shadow of his former self on May 2nd? compared to the Pac of the late 2000s?

I smell a duck coming lol

[Chrismart]

Yep. Nunn was legit. A great win.

[Johnwoo8686]

Pac was considered Number 2 in the world for sure, but it was a shell of the Pac of the late 2000s. But the question is if Floyd has a better win than Toney's over Nunn.

Here's a question for you: Was Pac a shadow of his former self on May 2nd? compared to the Pac of the late 2000s?

I smell a duck coming lol

I already answered your question if you look at my previous post smh... Beating Pacquiao when he was both WBO champion and the second best pound for pound fighter in the world is a bigger accomplishment than getting your ass whooped by Michael Nunn for nine rounds.