Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is or Is Not Lara a Quality Fight at 160

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce View Post
    How is Lara better than Murray?

    Comment


      Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
      He is no better or worse then the people GGG has been fighting
      He'd definitely be better and the only real boxer he'd have fought.

      Comment


        Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
        Who has Lara beat at middleweight? He was ranked at middleweight.
        Who has Monroe beaten at middleweight? You seriously think Lara would have any trouble with all the bums in Monroe's record? Has Monroe faced a bigger puncher than Angulo and Canelo (regardless of weightclass) and lived? He has not.
        Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
        Monroe IS a middleweight, and a good sized one at that who was 175-178 pounds in the ring
        Where in the world are you getting 178 from? He was 172 against Golovkin. Lara was 170 against Smith, and is only one inch shorter than Monre. Same reach. This isn't some huge size difference.
        Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
        If Lara were to fight Monroe I'd favor Monroe to win for sure. Not because I think Monroe is the better fighter or has a better resume but because he's the bigger fighter
        As I established, Monroe is barely bigger than Lara. And after fights like Cotto-Geale, Chavez-Vera/Martinez, I would have though everyone has learned that size does not win fights by now. I mean, you would almost (and I emphasize almost here) have a point if Monroe was a big puncher, but he's feather fisted with a 30% KO ratio. Do you believe Monroe hits harder than Canelo?
        Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
        and fights at 160
        and fights nobodies** at 160. What we know from Monroe is that he can handle mediocre fighters at middleweight. Lara can handle mediocre fighters at middleweight like Ronald Hearns too.

        This is some very spurious reasoning from you. Using your logic, you should favor any bigger feather fisted fighter with no notable wins over an elite fighter in the weight class below.
        Last edited by DoktorSleepless; 07-06-2015, 02:00 PM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
          I agree. More so the reasoning why if he can't get fights as his team says, why not fight Lara (again for those, lara > Rosado)? I mean... shit they picked monroe over lara because he was more known according to sanchez.
          And that was straight garbage. It's the first time since Golovkin hit the US that I don't think his team put in effort to fight the best possible opponent. Yeah, he fought Stevens and Rosado and Ishida, but always once he had tried to fight better fighters. For Monroe they pretty much had him in the pipeline before the Murray fight even happened.

          I won't ever defend that, and I'll be pissed if they do that again.

          Comment


            Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce View Post
            But you haven't even done that. You named 4 guys who were his best wins, and those guys he beat, aren't better than the guys Golovkins opponents beat. So what exactly makes a jr middleweight a quality opponent at 160?

            Lara is a better fight for Floyd than GGG is he not?
            I smell a current/former pac fan who's now a GGG fan...

            do CW's, fighting unranked guys, guys after beatings affect Pac legacy
            //krikya360.com/forums/sh...7#post15707757

            Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce View Post
            fighter
            of
            the
            decade

            Comment


              Lara would be the most skilled guy GGG has fought as a pro.

              They never fought each other in the ams, did they? How did that go?

              Anyhow, these guys are close enough to the same size that this fight should be viewed as legit @ 160, imo.

              Make the fight.

              Comment


                Originally posted by lefthook2daliva View Post
                Lara would be the most skilled guy GGG has fought as a pro.

                They never fought each other in the ams, did they? How did that go?

                Anyhow, these guys are close enough to the same size that this fight should be viewed as legit @ 160, imo.

                Make the fight.


                It's not some huge physical mismatch as people are making it out to be. Whoever wins, it won't be due to to size. It'll be due to skill.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                  I smell a current/former pac fan who's now a GGG fan...

                  do CW's, fighting unranked guys, guys after beatings affect Pac legacy
                  //krikya360.com/forums/sh...7#post15707757



                  How is Lara better than Murray?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by lefthook2daliva View Post
                    Lara would be the most skilled guy GGG has fought as a pro.

                    They never fought each other in the ams, did they? How did that go?

                    Anyhow, these guys are close enough to the same size that this fight should be viewed as legit @ 160, imo.

                    Make the fight.
                    Backing away jabbing all night is a skill now?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View Post


                      It's not some huge physical mismatch as people are making it out to be. Whoever wins, it won't be due to to size. It'll be due to skill.
                      Well that kills another lame excuse by the GGG fantards

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP