Originally posted by Baltimore
View Post
Which one from the two fighters fought and beat elite opponents in their prime?
A: Ward
B: Golovkin
I go by the logic that in a situation like this when I have to choose which one I should believe I go with the more proved fighter because he didn't "tried to" make big fight but actually proved that he isn't scared of elite opponents. So while I don't call any of them a duck I think if you already must to do it you shouldn't call the only one of them a duck who proved that he can beat elite opponents. It's just not logical.
Ward had a lay off I don't know when people will get this in their mind, he couldn't dodge anyone because he didn't fight anyone. Now after a long lay off it's natural that he gets a tune up. He is criticized because his tune up while Golovkin is praised for feasting on the likes of Geale or Rubio.
Fuck logic...
If Ward goes up to 175 to fight Kovalev, Golovin and his more biased fans here will look very-very dumb. Even dumber than now.
Comment