Name the fighters you don't like and explain why

[The Hammer]

is this the thread were fanboy #1 of wladimir klitschko talks about another fighter for holding?

wladimir held more in certain rounds against povetkin than ward did in his entire fight with carl froch.

??????????

Exactly where in this thread did I say that?

[Humean]

Mayweather - Just a ridiculous creature

Froch - Arrogant prick who thinks he is way better than he is

Ward - Hypocrite, creates an image of nobleness but at root is about as selfish and greedy as it gets (short of Mayweather that is)

Guerrero - Achieved the incredible feet of being more annoying than
Mayweather Jr + Sr in build up to Mayweather fight, quite the achievement.

Leo Santa Cruz - Seems far too content with not fighting anyone good.

Khan - The very definition of a twat.

Bellew - There are no words to fully give justice to what a complete bell-end he is.

[Dinamita 03]

We clearly totally disagree on what is considered One-Dimensional. Rigondeaux is not One-Dimensional, not even close. I've seen Rigo Out-Box Donaire and Agbeko but also seen him put his foot on the gas and blast guys like Willie Casey, Teon Kennedy and Rico Ramos. You're confusing One-Dimensional vs A Fighters Strength and that is NOT what I'm talking about at all. One-Dimensional fighters while I'm not a fan of their style, I still respect them but I'm just not crazy about watching a guy do the same thing for 12 Rounds and struggle to land a clean punch on his opponent, because that is all he knows how to do and then fans complain not about the fighters inabilities but more so they complain about his opponents for fighter smart and using his advantages over the One-Dimensional Fighter. Backfoot Fighters don't get a pass, just as well as you fight off your backfoot, you should be able to fight inside as well. I complain about Lara's lack of killer instinct as well and it has cost him decisions, in fact I have a bit of a issue with most of the fighters trained by Ronnie Shields (Lara, Jermell Charlo) who do a lot of backfoot fighting but not much inside fighting and don't stand on their punches. I'm not much of a Jermell Charlo fan because his style is strictly backfoot and nothing else. Yes that is One-Dimensional as well so no One-Dimensional does not apply to just Brawlers because not every Brawler is One-Dimensional. A lot of the fighters fans think are Brawlers, many of them are actually BOXER/PUNCHERS and NOT One-Dimensional Brawlers!

No one's confusing anything man, of course every fighter focuses their style based on their strengths. However, Rigondeaux is not a complete fighter, and quite honestly he doesn't have to be since he is so dominant in his boxing abilities. He clearly has no inside game and isn't as dominant at forcing the action. The Agbeko fights was the same repetitive action from Rigondeaux throughout, he couldn't get him out of there as he wasn't as effective being the aggressor once Agbeko caved in. It's not a knock on him it just points out how flawed your logic is that you have to be a master of all styles to be considered a p4p fighter. Like I said Lara is basically a one handed fighter yet he's still talented enough to be near the top 10. Being one dimensional isn't always a slight on a guy.

[sicko]

No one's confusing anything man, of course every fighter focuses their style based on their strengths. However, Rigondeaux is not a complete fighter, and quite honestly he doesn't have to be since he is so dominant in his boxing abilities. He clearly has no inside game and isn't as dominant at forcing the action. The Agbeko fights was the same repetitive action from Rigondeaux throughout, he couldn't get him out of there as he wasn't as effective being the aggressor once Agbeko caved in. It's not a knock on him it just points out how flawed your logic is that you have to be a master of all styles to be considered a p4p fighter. Like I said Lara is basically a one handed fighter yet he's still talented enough to be near the top 10. Being one dimensional isn't always a slight on a guy.

You still don't get it at all. You're lost and confuse and don't understand styles and what one-dimensional is. My Exact Quote as far as what P4P is to me:

You're not a P4P fighter if you can't deal with and/or figure out ALL STYLES. P4P fighters should be able to do it ALL, he really shouldn't be lacking in many Categories.

Rigondeaux is not lack in many Categories, not only that but he won vs Abeko style did he not?

You're not a P4P fighter if you can't deal with and/or figure out ALL STYLES.

so that answers that. Rigondeaux has his flaws like every fighter but Rigondeaux can also do "A LITTLE OF EVERYTHING! Rigondeaux has more Strengths in his game than FLAWS

[Joe Beamish]

Cotto because he should either be a MW or drop the belt. Fight at 160. Fight GGG. I saw his true character against Pacquaio. I didn't like it.

Canelo because he didn't take any chances against Floyd.

I admire Floyd, Pacquaio, GGG.

[Dinamita 03]

You still don't get it at all. You're lost and confuse and don't understand styles and what one-dimensional is. My Exact Quote as far as what P4P is to me:


Rigondeaux is not lack in many Categories, not only that but he won vs Abeko style did he not? so that answers that. Rigondeaux has his flaws like every fighter but Rigondeaux can also do "A LITTLE OF EVERYTHING! Rigondeaux has more Strengths in his game than FLAWS

P4P fighters should be able to do it ALL, he really shouldn't be lacking in many Categories.

You're whole basis of defining p4p is flawed and a contradiction.

You don't get to be an elite fighter if you can't do a little of everything to some extent, but it's illogical to expect top fighters to perform at the A level in every single department as Bernard and you are implying. That's more a definition of an ATG not current p4p.