Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao's Greatest Fights: Path of an All-Time Great Fighter

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
    but he's not cutting weight at 147.
    He didn't cut weight to make 130. Keep going.

    Comment


      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
      Nah, not if it doesn't change where I rank them. It's like when someone says they were injured and that's why they lost. Maybe. You still lost and that's that.
      You are literally taking credit away from Pacquiao and attributing his success to something else.

      That is what discrediting is. You are discrediting his achievements. How can i put it more simply?

      Comment


        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        He didn't cut weight to make 130. Keep going.
        oh man.....

        this shiet is so funny.


        TUA: "PAC DOESN'T CUT WEIGHT TO MAKE 147."

        IMDAZED: "He didn't cut weight to make 130. Keep going."

        Comment


          Originally posted by Tom Cruise View Post
          You are literally taking credit away from Pacquiao and attributing his success to something else.

          That is what discrediting is. You are discrediting his achievements. How can i put it more simply?
          Literally? LOL.

          No, I'm not taking credit away. You can keep trying to say but it won't change what I'm posting. I suspect he used against Cotto. Does that diminish the win? No. To me, it's a great win. Heck, who knows, Cotto may have been using too. That's the way it is today. I don't take anything away from a fighter who may or may no be juicing as long as they tested clean.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
            oh man.....

            this shiet is so funny.


            TUA: "PAC DOESN'T CUT WEIGHT TO MAKE 147."

            IMDAZED: "He didn't cut weight to make 130. Keep going."

            Yeah because that was my original statement. I was discussing 130/135 and his subsequent rise up. All of a sudden you wanna change goalposts and talk about what he has to do at 147.

            Comment


              Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
              Yeah because that was my original statement. I was discussing 130/135 and his subsequent rise up. All of a sudden you wanna change goalposts and talk about what he has to do at 147.
              pac was 147 at 135.

              pac was 147 at 147.

              what rise up?

              jesus.

              you're the one that's all over the place.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                pac was 147 at 135.

                pac was 147 at 147.

                what rise up?

                jesus.

                you're the one that's all over the place.
                He was 147 at 135

                The difference is that he cut weight. Or is gaining 10-15lbs overnight normal in your world?

                Comment


                  A 32 Time World Champion.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                    He was 147 at 135

                    The difference is that he cut weight. Or is gaining 10-15lbs overnight normal in your world?
                    it actually is. most boxers cut 10-15 lbs.


                    and if pac cut 10-15 lbs. at 130-135 lbs. but doesn't at 147.

                    HE'S THE SAME SIZE.

                    use your brain, man.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      He was 147 at 135

                      The difference is that he cut weight. Or is gaining 10-15lbs overnight normal in your world?
                      Is this post for real? Is it even that uncommon for a fighter to rehydrate 10-15lbs overnight nowadays?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP