Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao's Greatest Fights: Path of an All-Time Great Fighter
Collapse
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostNah, not if it doesn't change where I rank them. It's like when someone says they were injured and that's why they lost. Maybe. You still lost and that's that.
That is what discrediting is. You are discrediting his achievements. How can i put it more simply?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tom Cruise View PostYou are literally taking credit away from Pacquiao and attributing his success to something else.
That is what discrediting is. You are discrediting his achievements. How can i put it more simply?
No, I'm not taking credit away. You can keep trying to say but it won't change what I'm posting. I suspect he used against Cotto. Does that diminish the win? No. To me, it's a great win. Heck, who knows, Cotto may have been using too. That's the way it is today. I don't take anything away from a fighter who may or may no be juicing as long as they tested clean.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postoh man.....
this shiet is so funny.
TUA: "PAC DOESN'T CUT WEIGHT TO MAKE 147."
IMDAZED: "He didn't cut weight to make 130. Keep going."
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostYeah because that was my original statement. I was discussing 130/135 and his subsequent rise up. All of a sudden you wanna change goalposts and talk about what he has to do at 147.
pac was 147 at 147.
what rise up?
jesus.
you're the one that's all over the place.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostHe was 147 at 135
The difference is that he cut weight. Or is gaining 10-15lbs overnight normal in your world?
and if pac cut 10-15 lbs. at 130-135 lbs. but doesn't at 147.
HE'S THE SAME SIZE.
use your brain, man.
Comment
-
Comment