Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Manny Has First Random Drug Test

[Vasyl’s dad]

This proves what I have been saying all along how your brain works.

Let me give you a simpler more detailed example

I want my blood tested

I sent my blood sample to lab A and have them test it for my blood type.

I sent my blood sample to lab B and have them tested for my blood type.

Do you think lab A and lab B would give me different blood types results?

and:

I sent my blood sample to lab A and have them test it for blood count, and another test for blood type. I want the result in two separate sheets

One lab, one blood sample, two different test request, two different test results.

if you still insist that because VADA and USADA give the blood sample to just one lab it will return with one result then my friend you have a floyd err flawed way of thinking?

now replace "I"with authors "manuscript or written story" with blood sample and the "lab" with publisher or printing company and the "book" with the blood test result

irrelevant you say?

You realize you're dealing with a clown right? Hes the same moron who says Thomas Hauser isn't a reputable writer.

[D4thincarnation]

Aah, the failed test rumor that has never been verified.

Sorry, I cant fly with some unsubstantiated rumor that sounds absurd lol.

Nope, Paulie defamed Pacquiao FAR WORSE than Mayweather did.

He flat-out called him a dirty steroid cheat, no ifs or buts.

Paulie did it publicly, and he did it on numerous occasions, for years.

Paullie is a loudmouth, and Mayweather had motive to do it as well, hurting Pacquiao credibility career boosted Floyd's.

There were rumours around Armstrong as well, they covered it up well, just like Floyd.

PED dealers/maker hangs out round Floyd's gym. Dirty gym as well how many have been caught cheating from there.

[D4thincarnation]

No.

Bob Arum has admitted that the drug testing requirements were on the table from day one..... also, Roach agreed to them from day one.

It was from day two that the problems began LOL

It wasn't Floyd has even said so, that he brought up the blood testing after Pac wanted 10 million for every 1lbs over 147lbs.

Find me something on blood testing demands before December 10th 2009. Prove me wrong

[aboutfkntime]

I think NO ONE should be allowed to inject any numbing medication in their hands until AFTER the fight.

I agree.

Besides, its real dangerous.

Way to fakk your career.

It is highly unlikely that Mayweather uses it.

You would never use something like that to manage a continual/permanent injury. Pain exists for a reason, funnily enough pain is actually your friend.

I can see it being used temporarily, in a one-off situation, for the right kind of injury..... but not continually/permanently.

You could easily unknowingly turn a small minor injury into a major career-threatening injury, without even realising it until after the numbing agent wore off. And if you have continual problems with your hands then the likelihood of a permanent injury is that much higher.

Highly unlikely that Mayweather would be ******/cheap enough to see that as an effective solution. Surgery/rehab/preventive action, is how a professional athlete would manage such an injury.

[D4thincarnation]

I agree.

Besides, its real dangerous.

Way to fakk your career.

It is highly unlikely that Mayweather uses it.

You would never use something like that to manage a continual/permanent injury. Pain exists for a reason, funnily enough pain is actually your friend.

I can see it being used temporarily, in a one-off situation, for the right kind of injury..... but not continually/permanently.

You could easily unknowingly turn a small minor injury into a major career-threatening injury, without even realising it until after the numbing agent wore off. And if you have continual problems with your hands then the likelihood of a permanent injury is that much higher.

Highly unlikely that Mayweather would be ******/cheap enough to see that as an effective solution. Surgery/rehab/preventive action, is how a professional athlete would manage such an injury.

Maybe just can't deal with pain, see how he reacted when Maidana nibbled his glove.

[Rath]

You realize you're dealing with a clown right? Hes the same moron who says Thomas Hauser isn't a reputable writer.

I do, the only concern I have is that Floyd fans keep spewing 100% untrue or 50% truth mix with another 50% lies in this forum and it's not just the member who read those statement.

there are guest who read those too and when those guest who read those untrue statement they surely will use it in their conversation with other people who knows less about Pac and Floyd and the lies spreads.

then we see in this forum that those same fans brands casual fans DKSAB

[Rath]

YOU.... don't make me laugh. You need more people for this comment and I think everyone will admit that you do stalk me and call my name out in every thread. You are a JACK ASS and any post debate you pull up it would be proven even more so please go for it.

I owned you many times over and that is just with your roach sig alone as the premise.

It's like Roach is an apple tree, you took a bite on all those apple coming from roach tree and choose one that taste less sweet and pass it off to people that that apple fruit is the only fruit that comes from roach tree and it taste less sweet.

When I told you that you are wrong because i also have an apple that comes from roach tree and its sweet, you answered with i am not talking about that apple I am talking about this apple that i got.

What you forgot to realize is that the premise of the argument is not the particular apple but the tree where it came from.

how do i know i owned you?

you removed that roach statement with big bold red letters from your sig.

next time you present fruits from Roach tree present all the fruits not just those that you think taste less sweet.

take the L and let's move to another topic where you might get even. and i stress might.

[radioraheem]

This proves what I have been saying all along how your brain works.

Let me give you a simpler more detailed example

I want my blood tested

I sent my blood sample to lab A and have them test it for my blood type.

I sent my blood sample to lab B and have them tested for my blood type.

Do you think lab A and lab B would give me different blood types results?

and:

I sent my blood sample to lab A and have them test it for blood count, and another test for blood type. I want the result in two separate sheets

One lab, one blood sample, two different test request, two different test results.

if you still insist that because VADA and USADA give the blood sample to just one lab it will return with one result then my friend you have a floyd err flawed way of thinking?

now replace "I"with authors "manuscript or written story" with blood sample and the "lab" with publisher or printing company and the "book" with the blood test result

irrelevant you say?

Yes, irrelevant and still foolish. First, there is no LAB A and LAB B. There is only one single LAB. If Lab A and Lab B did exist, it would be possible or argued that one might get different results. But only a single LAB exists in this case (UCLA).

Now if you want to argue that both VADA and USADA should run tests, then all that is doing is just adding frequency. But there is no difference, only more samples will be taken. The same single LAB is being used.

If you were smarter. You would've argued that NSAC's random drug testing should be used in conjunction with USADA's. Because at least NSAC's program uses a different LAB (Utah). So not only would there be a higher frequency in taking samples, but more importantly results are coming from a completely different LAB.

[aboutfkntime]

So testing or not testing comes down to a boxer's standing in the sport? Pacquiao or anyone else could walk away without su****ion purely because they're a "big star"? That's a weird attitude. I could understand if he was being asked to do something Mayweather wasn't prepared to do, but it was for both of them. It's not about making an effort, I think it's more about a change in attitude, especially after that last Marquez fight. Ater that, Pacquiao himself stated that more stringent testing "was good for boxing". A shame he didn't feel that way, or according to you, had too much ego to think that way in '09.

I find the " ego " excuse to be the very worst of the 8-or-so excuses that were made by Team Pacquiao to avoid the drug testing protocol back in 2010.

It is obviously absurd.

So, my ego will not allow me to take part in random drug testing.....
..... I would rather say no, and raise su****ions about steroid abuse.

sure whatever

[tomhawq]

where the heck is mayweather's testing video? is this a joke or what? we all know it will come out eventually, but why the delay? are they manufacturing something to make it appear this guy is getting tested, then produce a negative result?