Originally posted by Rath
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion
Collapse
-
-
You know, I'm just going to remember the whole of the Pac-Nation in twosweethooks sig on here before the fight:
NO EXCUSES
And now, here we are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostNaah..
Now that you've asked..
Here read and weep hehe
Roger Mayweather: Floyd's legacy is going to be good but he needs to close that legacy with Pacquiao. He needs to go back and him and Pacquiao need to do it again. Thats what I think. To close the door in terms of victory, thats what he needs to do.
Jenna J: If Floyd does that, where does that put him amongst the greats?
Roger Mayweather: That would put him amongst the greatest fighters, but Floyd had a good, long legacy anyways. He will be amongst some of the greatest fighters but hes got to close the thing with Pacquiao before he ever does that, because thats one of the known guys that people respect and I think thats the guy that he's gonna have to beat or have to show something with.
Even Roger Mayweather knows Floyd didn't conclude anything that night.
The truth cuts like butter. Enjoy.
Comment
-
As all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed by the boxing and general public for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a smaller man (5 inch reach disadvantage, 2 inch height disadvantage) who medical verification has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt...
was fighting with only one arm.
Now, Mayweather is trying to re-write history by manipulating public perception via the deceptive act of bogusly blaming Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.
THINK. The problem is: The more Mayweather blames Pacquiao's shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and...
making meaningless his (Floyd Mayweather's) so-called "win."
Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, how the hell can can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
Is Mayweather's win really tarnished forever? Does it even count now that it will forever be remembered that he so-called "beat" a one armed man?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bald Shavers View PostAs all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed by the boxing and general public for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a smaller man (5 inch reach disadvantage, 2 inch height disadvantage) who medical verification has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt...
was fighting with only one arm.
Now, Mayweather is trying to re-write history by manipulating public perception via the deceptive act of bogusly blaming Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.
THINK. The problem is: The more Mayweather blames Pacquiao's shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and...
making meaningless his (Floyd Mayweather's) so-called "win."
Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, how the hell can can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
Is Mayweather's win really tarnished forever? Does it even count now that it will forever be remembered that he so-called "beat" a one armed man?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bald Shavers View PostAs all of us know, Floyd - because of excessive holding and constant running - has been singlehandedly blamed by the boxing and general public for the boringness of the so-called "Fight of the Century" during which he managed to lose 4 rounds to a smaller man (5 inch reach disadvantage, 2 inch height disadvantage) who medical verification has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt...
was fighting with only one arm.
Now, Mayweather is trying to re-write history by manipulating public perception via the deceptive act of bogusly blaming Pacquiao for making the fight a boring dud. Specifically, he keeps blaming Pac's not being honest about his injury pre-fight for the reason for the fight's boringness.
THINK. The problem is: The more Mayweather blames Pacquiao's shoulder injury for the fight's boringness the more he admits that he indeed beat a one armed fighter, hence tainting and...
making meaningless his (Floyd Mayweather's) so-called "win."
Besides accepting a rematch offer from Pacquiao, how the hell can can Floyd Mayweather get out of the no win situation that has resulted in his having "beaten" a one armed man with a 5 inch reach disadvantage who he waited to fight 5 years too late?
Is Mayweather's win really tarnished forever? Does it even count now that it will forever be remembered that he so-called "beat" a one armed man?
Comment
Comment