had a quick scan of this thread.
basically it comes down to two points of view:
1. Dunn thinks that if you are the star it's cool for you to take unfair advantages over your opponent and will support a guy who does so and hopes said star will use said unfair advantages/weakening of the opponent to get the win.
2. Most others think taking an unfair advantage is a pussy move and that both fighters should be comfortable and in the equipment/gear they prefer so we have a nice even and above all fair fight where both guys are coming into it at their best.
think we can see how this one stands ... any need to continue the thread further?
basically it comes down to two points of view:
1. Dunn thinks that if you are the star it's cool for you to take unfair advantages over your opponent and will support a guy who does so and hopes said star will use said unfair advantages/weakening of the opponent to get the win.
2. Most others think taking an unfair advantage is a pussy move and that both fighters should be comfortable and in the equipment/gear they prefer so we have a nice even and above all fair fight where both guys are coming into it at their best.
think we can see how this one stands ... any need to continue the thread further?
Comment