Originally posted by Scott-Weiland
View Post
Chisora was a legit test. One of the reasons so many picked Chisora to win (aside from their obvious underrating of Fury's skillset) was that he was coming off an impressive win streak and had had a full training camp to prepare for Fury, as opposed to the last time. It was only after Fury handled him so easily that people started throwing around the 'shot' label. Prior to that, nobody was accusing Chisora of looking shot, because he wasn't.
Saying that you now hold him in the same esteem as Danny Williams is absolutely ludicrous and shows your depth of disdain for Fury as a fighter. Get a grip and realise that just because someone loses to Fury doesn't automatically mean he's done. Fury dominated Chisora because he was that much better than him, the same way all of Wlad's opponents are made to look like turd despite being, in many cases, fine fighters in their own right.
Your hatred of Fury really is something else. What on earth will you say about Wlad if Fury actually beats him? Will he automatically go from most dominant champ in history to Roy Jones level glass-jawed joke overnight?
Comment