Originally posted by Elroy1
View Post
But looking from Lennox's perspective, Vitali wasn't in his era. He wasn't part of the scene in the 90s and therefore the thirst for beating him (again) was close to zilch. Lennox's legacy wouldn't have gained much from beating Vitali, because it was a new era.
I don't think you can say how long a fighter should continue to fight for, as each fighter is different. When you fight at world level from 18 years old like Tyson, then it's damn near impossible to keep it going for 20 years. Especially these days with the PPV, the notoriety, pressure etc. Also, if you take into account the beatings and the wars he's been in.
Others like Wlad, really only entered the world scene (as in fighting top contenders) consistently in 2004+ - One of the reasons why he can keep himself fresh. And despite taking a beating a few times, he hasn't really been in any 'wars' that has really taken it out of him - similarly to Lennox before the Vitali fight. He'd only really been in with Mercer which was a very tough fight.
Also, Lewis talked about retirement after Holyfield. He said he wanted Tyson and then that was it. He fought Vitali in what was clearly his retirement fight from the start, but nobody expected it to be such a good close fight.
Comment