Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paulie Malignaggi beats Manny Pacquiao fair and square.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Paulie Malignaggi beats Manny Pacquiao fair and square.

    OK I said it. Let's be honest here. Manny Pacquiao is a good fighter but not a good boxer. When Bradley chose to box instead of fighting he had good success. There's not much similarities between Malignaggi and Bradley but the common denominator is BOXING.
    Marquez gives Manny problems because he is a good boxer.
    Shane Mosley had success until he had an injury. What I noticed about Pacquiao is anyone who keeps it simple and just boxes him will give him problems and have no doubt that Paulie Malignaggi beats Manny Pacquiao. Malignaggi is a very good boxer, he has good movement. Yes because of the many operations he has had on his hands he does not have much power but still beats Pacquiao. We know he can take a good punch too but that does not really matter because Pacquiao's power went away with Ariza.

    In short Pacquiao would lose by wide unanimous decision to Malignaggi.

    #2
    Maybe you'd have a case if it were Prime Paulie vs faded 35 yr old Pacquiao but no way he beats prime Pac. If Cotto was able to hunt Paulie down then I'm sure Pac would be able to much easier.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Prime 407 View Post
      Maybe you'd have a case if it were Prime Paulie vs faded 35 yr old Pacquiao but no way he beats prime Pac. If Cotto was able to hunt Paulie down then I'm sure Pac would be able to much easier.
      Cotto does not have the movement of Pacquiao and Cotto is good at closing the distance. He even closed the distance and minimised Floyd's movement no wonder it was easier for Cotto. Styles make fights and Manny Pacquiao comes in and goes out.Once he has a target he goes in and when someone moves it confuses him and reduces his movement punch output greatly. Check all his fights, if you move to your left Manny does not know what to do. Just rewatch the Bradley and Mosley fight and you will notice. the pattern. Even a slower fighter like Marquez gives him problems just because he boxes.

      Comment


        #4
        Everyone thinks im crazy bbut I also think Paulie would best him.
        Paulie is a hell of a boxer.
        He knows how to move around the ring,
        is great at distance and positioning and is fast.
        If he stays on point like he does, i believe he would make pac look ****** and make him miss all night.

        Comment


          #5
          nothing new here.. pac always loses to fantasy fights.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by baCCaT View Post
            nothing new here.. pac always loses to fantasy fights.
            yup. he loses to his brother bobby too.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Jakutindi Wauya View Post
              OK I said it. Let's be honest here. Manny Pacquiao is a good fighter but not a good boxer. When Bradley chose to box instead of fighting he had good success. There's not much similarities between Malignaggi and Bradley but the common denominator is BOXING.
              Marquez gives Manny problems because he is a good boxer.
              Shane Mosley had success until he had an injury. What I noticed about Pacquiao is anyone who keeps it simple and just boxes him will give him problems and have no doubt that Paulie Malignaggi beats Manny Pacquiao. Malignaggi is a very good boxer, he has good movement. Yes because of the many operations he has had on his hands he does not have much power but still beats Pacquiao. We know he can take a good punch too but that does not really matter because Pacquiao's power went away with Ariza.

              In short Pacquiao would lose by wide unanimous decision to Malignaggi.
              you went full ******. NEVER go full ******. (ive been saying this too much in these forums, i need a break from reading ******ed as threads like this).

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by hypodermical View Post
                you went full ******. NEVER go full ******. (ive been saying this too much in these forums, i need a break from reading ******ed as threads like this).
                Break granted. Now go and get rotton.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Jakutindi Wauya View Post
                  OK I said it. Let's be honest here. Manny Pacquiao is a good fighter but not a good boxer. When Bradley chose to box instead of fighting he had good success. There's not much similarities between Malignaggi and Bradley but the common denominator is BOXING.
                  Marquez gives Manny problems because he is a good boxer.
                  Shane Mosley had success until he had an injury. What I noticed about Pacquiao is anyone who keeps it simple and just boxes him will give him problems and have no doubt that Paulie Malignaggi beats Manny Pacquiao. Malignaggi is a very good boxer, he has good movement. Yes because of the many operations he has had on his hands he does not have much power but still beats Pacquiao. We know he can take a good punch too but that does not really matter because Pacquiao's power went away with Ariza.

                  In short Pacquiao would lose by wide unanimous decision to Malignaggi.
                  Pauli also UDs Ali and KTFOs Tyson

                  Comment


                    #10
                    pac just beat a 10x more superior boxer in timmy..



                    margo made floyd **** his pants

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP