Is Bradley the new Berto?

[GhostBlade]

Broner is the new Berto. If anything I think Berto is the more talented and powerful boxer and you saw how that turned out.

[-Kev-]

You Khan fans really hate Bradley don't you?

I'm a fan of Berto, and don't really like Bradley and even I admit they are different levels. Bradley is clearly a top fighter, I felt he fought 3 razor close fights with JMM and Pacquiao, two ATG's of his time. Berto lost to Ortiz, Guerrero and Karrass.

[Ringlife]

No, Bradley is not the next Berto. I did feel he lost both fights agains't Pac. I would still like to see Bradley vs Prov 2. Berto even though he loses the guy comes to fight win lose or draw. I don't dislike Berto at all the guy is always in exciting fights. Like fights with Collazo,Ortiz and Soto Karass.

[DoubleLeftH00k]

if bradley was the new berto then we will see floyd picking pac by the end of the year
pac just beat berto

YEAHHHH.......

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

bradley sort of a gatekeeper type boxer now at 147, just like berto?

can't be considered elite, but not a total bum. got away with a few gift decisions like berto did but turns out he's not as good as some thought.

possibly a gatekeeper test for upcoming 147 boxers like khan, broner, thurman, maidana, porter etc..

[IMG]//i1011.***********.com/albums/af233/MikeViebeck/thisthreadsucks.jpg[/IMG]

[Gonzalez_Boxing]

Adrien "Berto Reincarnated" Broner

Bradley is just a local bum, BERTO GOAT

"AB" = Another Berto

[FlatLine]

I think that is a harsh assessment. Bradley's legacy will always be stained for ducking "that chinny guy", but even if you factor out the Pacquiao fight he did beat some serious talent.

all those fights were real close though - even his fight with Junior Witter was SD, Marquez was SD, Prov needed 1 round on 2 scorecards to win.. and pac beat him twice too..

but those other fights bradley basically showed he was around the same level as the other boxers, not actually better than them.. he was just lucky with the judges on those nights

[LacedUp]

You said, "Bradley is practically a journeyman at this point". So I asked you, "then wtf is Khan"? Now who's ******ed again??

I didn't say you were ******ed - but with this post, you are coming close to looking like it.

I was being sarcastic, my butthurt child of a fellow poster. Go back and read the posts I did early in this thread and you can see I was saying it was rubbish.

[Check]

all those fights were real close though - even his fight with Junior Witter was SD, Marquez was SD, Prov needed 1 round on 2 scorecards to win.. and pac beat him twice too..

but those other fights bradley basically showed he was around the same level as the other boxers, not actually better than them.. he was just lucky with the judges on those nights

Once again you make ignorant and incorrect posts. You asked a question, everyone laughed at the ******ity, now move on. It's obvious that no one really thinks Bradley is the new Berto, so stop trying to justify your ****** question.

[RAV3N]

bradley sort of a gatekeeper type boxer now at 147, just like berto?

can't be considered elite, but not a total bum. got away with a few gift decisions like berto did but turns out he's not as good as some thought.

possibly a gatekeeper test for upcoming 147 boxers like khan, broner, thurman, maidana, porter etc..

No, you just want to discredit Pac's win over a p4p #3 fighter.

He would probably beat all the fighters you mentioned.

Try again Floyd Fanboy.