Originally posted by marvin douglas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Bradley II - Two Neutral Judges Requested
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by George Orwell View Postthis is a very difficult fight to judge actually because the rounds are close and both guys have a good enough defense not to be rocked or visibly hurt. Not to mention they both will be throwing a comparable number of punches. I have Pac 8 rounds in the first but I admit 3-4 of them were won just barely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by George Orwell View Postthis is a very difficult fight to judge actually because the rounds are close and both guys have a good enough defense not to be rocked or visibly hurt. Not to mention they both will be throwing a comparable number of punches. I have Pac 8 rounds in the first but I admit 3-4 of them were won just barely.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by marvin douglas View PostWhy would Arum have paid off the judges to give Bradley the win? Pac was Arum's cash cow and the loss to Bradley destroyed any chance of a Pac vs. Mayweather bout, which, at that time, would have been the biggest fight in PPV history. Besides, I had Bradley winning the Pac fight 115-113.
Arum is notorious for rematches. Having Bradley beat Pac was supposed to have created a new star and set a potential trilogy. That is what we are getting now. It just took longer than Arum planned to get Bradley off the ground due to the blowback from the first Pac/Bradley fight.
Arum doesn't really want neutral judges he is just saying what he needs to say to appease the public and keep interest up. Mark my words unless Bradley does the impossible, Pac takes this next fight by hook or crook.
Comment
Comment