Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: Manny Pacquiao Gotta Kill Me To Stop Me!

[BennyST]

I don't agree with one word in this post..It's ya right to like or dislike who ever you want..If I was Bradley I would consistently point to the first fight..So fight fans like ya self can go back and view it,and if you take ya bais out of it,you'd see it was a close fight..Not that Bradley clearly won,and not that Manny clearly won..Cause if you don't see how someone could have giving certain rds to Bradley(which lead to him winning the fight),your drinking to much of the Pacman kool-aid..

I don't dislike Bradley in general at all, but when he says this stuff it does make me dislike him.

Nonetheless, the only person here with any bias my friend is the person saying Bradley could have won. He won a few rounds, but he lost the fight badly and very clearly. It's really never been up for debate apart from in the minds of the 'Bradley Top 3' type of guys. It's always the crazy few who yell the loudest.

When you only have 10 people out of 265 giving Bradley the win, and that included only 1 of 47 press row scorers, that is really as unanimous as it gets in boxing. There's always the nutty few, but when it's about 3% of scorers giving it to Bradley, it's not close and not hard to score. Let's not start the revisionist history.

It can be difficult to comprehend you're wrong when you feel a certain way sometimes, but when you're in the 3% of people that think Bradley won, the other 97% are shaking their heads in pity and confusion.

[Strategic1]

I don't agree with one word in this post..It's ya right to like or dislike who ever you want..If I was Bradley I would consistently point to the first fight..So fight fans like ya self can go back and view it,and if you take ya bais out of it,you'd see it was a close fight..Not that Bradley clearly won,and not that Manny clearly won..Cause if you don't see how someone could have giving certain rds to Bradley(which lead to him winning the fight),your drinking to much of the Pacman kool-aid..

Manny CLEARLY won. 98% of boxing fans, experts, writers, media have Pacquiao winning. 5 WBO judges were assigned to review the fight, and they all had it for pacquiao.

If you disagree, you're the one drinking the kool-aid. Get your facts straight.

[Strategic1]

Press row was something like 53-3 in favor of PAC and a majority had PAC winning wide... 117-111, 118-110.

It was more like 8 rounds to 4 in favor of PAC. and Bradley won a couple of rounds only because PAC took it easy down the stretch.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I don't dislike Bradley in general at all, but when he says this stuff it does make me dislike him.

Nonetheless, the only person here with any bias my friend is the person saying Bradley could have won. He won a few rounds, but he lost the fight badly and very clearly. It's really never been up for debate apart from in the minds of the 'Bradley Top 3' type of guys. It's always the crazy few who yell the loudest.

When you only have 10 people out of 265 giving Bradley the win, and that included only 1 of 47 press row scorers, that is really as unanimous as it gets in boxing. There's always the nutty few, but when it's about 3% of scorers giving it to Bradley, it's not close and not hard to score. Let's not start the revisionist history.

It can be difficult to comprehend you're wrong when you feel a certain way sometimes, but when you're in the 3% of people that think Bradley won, the other 97% are shaking their heads in pity and confusion.

Manny CLEARLY won. 98% of boxing fans, experts, writers, media have Pacquiao winning. 5 WBO judges were assigned to review the fight, and they all had it for pacquiao.

If you disagree, you're the one drinking the kool-aid. Get your facts straight.

Press row was something like 53-3 in favor of PAC and a majority had PAC winning wide... 117-111, 118-110.

It was more like 8 rounds to 4 in favor of PAC. and Bradley won a couple of rounds only because PAC took it easy down the stretch.

Sure..Anyway I advise you go back and watch the fight ya self..If you still feel it was a whitewash..Fine..It's ya right to..Just as it's my right too feel it was a close fight..End of the day all three judges saw a close fight fight..I'd ride with them..

Instead of being baby's and saying something that a man believes can't be true..Why not just say I can't wait to see Manny prove this guy wrong..Or you can't wait for Pac to shut Bradley up..I mean why would a comment sway anyone on liking someone or not??Esp if that's what the guy really believes??

So what happens if Bradley wins another close fight??Will Pac fans and the world say Pac was robbed again??I remember a lot of close fights I can name a bunch right now(recent ones as well)where the fighter people wanted to see win loss..So they call robbery..It happens very often in this sport..How about even just last week..People are calling Garcia vs Herrera a robbery,which is a complete joke..Some said the decision in the Bradley Pac fight was worst then the Pwill Lara fight..Which is ridiculous..

I can go on and on..At the end of the day if the fighter feels he won,that's what he feels..Pac has to come and do something about it..Bradley excepted his challenge..Let's see um fight..To say Bradley should not talk about the first fight when there is a lot to talk about(from the first fight)is absurd..

[Shambrolic]

People need to not give this fight any expectations, that's what happened in the first fight for me. I never really watch Bradley fight probably like once before and couldn't bare what I was watching so I kind of like nodded off. Pacquaio I knew him, thanks to all his fights with popular names and what he done in dominant fashion. I knew boxing but I didn't really knew boxing, until I actually started watching more fighters. I particularly had a bias to Mexican fighters and Pacquiao because of the aggressive natures of the fight and it pretty much was easily understood what I was watching.

Now after 2009 hit I had to do some revisionist type of work as Mayweather reappears and causes some spark amongst boxing fans and I was confused as to why because I thought he was boring and De La Hoya was robbed when I seen the fight live. But after listening to "experts" grand nut bouncing I decided to start from James l Sullivan to now. I now have an appreciation for all styles and understand boxing for what it is now.

I watch so much so that I can now see what is happening when before I thought punches connected when someone throws a flurry but now I see that when someone knows defense or rides the punches to take off the pop and counter...

Anyway what I saw live because I was pro Pacquiao I missed out most of the good work Bradley applied because I wanted that damn super fight and counted things in favor of Pacquiao because I wasn't familiar with Bradley or his style. I know we all human but a trained eye or someone who pays attention can see a fight for what it is and not miss things that are easily over looked. I urge everyone to re watch fights you never thought about.. You may surprise yourself of what you notice.

[zackrocha]

I think Pac won 9-3 but some of the rounds, although Pac won, were close. Pac just didn' pressure Tim. For the record, been Manny's fan since he beat Barrera in early 2000's

[Rome-By-Ko]

People need to not give this fight any expectations, that's what happened in the first fight for me. I never really watch Bradley fight probably like once before and couldn't bare what I was watching so I kind of like nodded off. Pacquaio I knew him, thanks to all his fights with popular names and what he done in dominant fashion. I knew boxing but I didn't really knew boxing, until I actually started watching more fighters. I particularly had a bias to Mexican fighters and Pacquiao because of the aggressive natures of the fight and it pretty much was easily understood what I was watching.

Now after 2009 hit I had to do some revisionist type of work as Mayweather reappears and causes some spark amongst boxing fans and I was confused as to why because I thought he was boring and De La Hoya was robbed when I seen the fight live. But after listening to "experts" grand nut bouncing I decided to start from James l Sullivan to now. I now have an appreciation for all styles and understand boxing for what it is now.

I watch so much so that I can now see what is happening when before I thought punches connected when someone throws a flurry but now I see that when someone knows defense or rides the punches to take off the pop and counter...

Anyway what I saw live because I was pro Pacquiao I missed out most of the good work Bradley applied because I wanted that damn super fight and counted things in favor of Pacquiao because I wasn't familiar with Bradley or his style. I know we all human but a trained eye or someone who pays attention can see a fight for what it is and not miss things that are easily over looked. I urge everyone to re watch fights you never thought about.. You may surprise yourself of what you notice.

Great post..

[typeone]

Funny as duck, he hasn't got to kill you Bradley to get a win, He has just got to hope that Arum has bet on him meaning Manny he will be sure to win... Who's the Ref for this fight Cortez?? Lol

[ßringer]

It is pretty ****ing hilarious that Bradley continues to drum on about how he beat Manny in their first fight...but showed up at the post-fight presser in a wheelchair.

[Manic Shot]

After April 12.....PACMAN the murderer!!!