Which is greater? Pac offense? Floyd defense?

[SplitSecond]

Pacquiao doesn't even have a better offense than Mayweather too, so this is kind of ridiculous

you're joking right?

common opposition shows pacquiao absolutely has better offense than mayweather

and larry judah nullyfied mayweather defense, floyd had to shut him down with pressure before he got sparked trying to box with defense that just got its code cracked

[Larry the boss]

you're joking right?

common opposition shows pacquiao absolutely has better offense than mayweather

and larry judah nullyfied mayweather defense, floyd had to shut him down with pressure before he got sparked trying to box with defense that just got its code cracked

Judah landed 19 percent of his punches..82 over all in 12 rounds..how in the hell is that nullifying floyds defense while he landed 47 percent and 188 punches


mpuBox Punchstats
Total Punches Mayweather Judah
Landed 188 82
Thrown 404 444
Pct. 47% 19%
Jabs Mayweather Judah
Landed 43 23
Thrown 109 282
Pct. 40% 8%
Power Punches Mayweather Judah
Landed 145 59
Thrown 295 162
Pct. 49% 36%
2006-04-08 : Floyd Mayweather Jr 146 lbs beat Zab Judah 145?lbs by UD in round 12 of 12
Location: Thomas & Mack Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Referee: Richard Steele
Judge: Glen Hamada 119-109
Judge: Dave Moretti 116-112
Judge: Jerry Roth 117-111
International Boxing Federation Welterweight Title (2nd defense of Judah)
International Boxing Organization Welterweight Title (Vacant)
Promoter: Top Rank
Ring Announcer: Michael Buffer
Aired On: HBO Pay-Per-View (Main Event)

Notes

[Spoon23]

PAC is a throwback, a fighter has to have heart.

[ImStillHere]

you're joking right?

common opposition shows pacquiao absolutely has better offense than mayweather

and larry judah nullyfied mayweather defense, floyd had to shut him down with pressure before he got sparked trying to box with defense that just got its code cracked

NO he's not, he's right. Pac has a much more effective offense than Floyd. But if were talking intelligent offense , skill wise, Floyd is better. When Floyd couldn't land on Cotto with the straight right, he switched to a genius lead left uppercut. Pac doesn't have that kind of variety to his offense. When he hurt Margs to the body he wasn't smart enough to keep going there.

But once again is very close and no reason to insult anyone.

[SplitSecond]

Judah landed 19 percent of his punches..82 over all in 12 rounds..how in the hell is that nullifying floyds defense while he landed 47 percent and 188 punches

try being a mental midget that when not folded throws 15 punches a round, after 4 rounds and having folded throws maybe 5 if we're lucky

[Larry the boss]

try being a mental midget that when not folded throws 15 punches a round, after 4 rounds and having folded throws maybe 5 if we're lucky

um ok so why did you say he nullified Floyds defense??? he got his ass kicked,got frustrated bloodied and went to dirty tactics...seems like ya'll like to judge a fight by 3 rounds then forget about the 9 rounds of ass whooping after that

[Doctor_Tenma]

you're joking right?

common opposition shows pacquiao absolutely has better offense than mayweather

and larry judah nullyfied mayweather defense, floyd had to shut him down with pressure before he got sparked trying to box with defense that just got its code cracked

Not at all, Mayweather can utilize his offense from close range and against the ropes a lot better than Pacquiao can. Goes to my initial point, offense and defense go and in hand, Mayweather has both a superior offense and defense.

[richardt]

Floyd's defense is the obvious choice. His defense has never cost him a serious loss like Pac's offense did.

[FeFist]

The question is easy to answer. Defensively Mayweather is one of the best boxers to lace up a pair of gloves, whereas offensively Pacquiao is not one of the best.

[richardt]

I cannot believe this is not a landslide in favor of Mayweather. This really is not up for debate. One is as perfect as it gets (Floyd) and the other though excellent in ways is flawed (Pac).