Originally posted by ramses07
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Didn't realize Tim Bradley's resume was this deep.
Collapse
-
-
That's just a list of names that look decent on paper.
Delve a little deeper and it isn't all that good a resume.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TRTboy View PostPacquiao (Very controversial)
Marquez (coming of KO 6 of Pac)
Provodnikov
Abregu (1st loss)
Peterson (1st loss)
Alexander (1st loss)
Witter (in the UK)
Miguel Vasquez
Kendall holt
Nate Campbell and joel casamayor for good measure
Casamayor was old as hell and Campbell was ok.
His run of Witter, Peterson and Alexander was impressive though.
Bradley gets let down due and ridiculed due to his behaviour post-Pac 1 and the fact that he openly ducked Khan. Other than that, I like him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TRTboy View PostPacquiao (Very controversial)
Marquez (coming of KO 6 of Pac)
Provodnikov
Abregu (1st loss)
Peterson (1st loss)
Alexander (1st loss)
Witter (in the UK)
Miguel Vasquez
Kendall holt
Nate Campbell and joel casamayor for good measure
That was one of the few times you can call a genuinely disgraceful corrupt robbery.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ramses07 View Postno way marquez is his best win, marquez is 40 years old for ****s sake, regardless of what type of win he was coming off of.
best win is alexander. prime for prime
then peterson, vazquez, holt
tho man there are lot of asterisks man, pacquiao, provo, and a lot of old dudes.
The only name you can take off this list is Pac cause that decision was bull**** but He did beat Provo. A very close fight but still did enough to win.Last edited by VatoMulatto; 03-17-2014, 07:16 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kai Proctor View PostIt's better than Khan's though.
How does Khan's **** taste? It's always in your mouth so was just wondering
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostYeah, that's a good resume, I'd take Pac off the list completely though and Abregu, he is C+ at best.
Casamayor was old as hell and Campbell was ok.
His run of Witter, Peterson and Alexander was impressive though.
Bradley gets let down due and ridiculed due to his behaviour post-Pac 1 and the fact that he openly ducked Khan. Other than that, I like him.
is it really a duck of khan when you're trying to get [and are successful] a fight with manny pacquiao?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostWhat does Khan have to do with this? Khan is younger than Bradley and has less experience. I wouldn't expect him to have a better resume but if that's your yardstick then ok...lol
How does Khan's **** taste? It's always in your mouth so was just wondering
khan's got plenty of experience and is old enough. he's in his physical prime.
the difference between bradley and khan is that khan has seriously deteriorated, and hardly getting by mexican journeymen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postkhan's got plenty of experience and is old enough. he's in his physical prime.
the difference between bradley and khan is that khan has seriously deteriorated, and hardly getting by mexican journeymen.
Comment
Comment