The fact that he was coming off a frankly embarrassing performance against Kotelnik before he fought Bradley diminishes the win.
The fact that Bradley couldn't beat him as convincingly or impressively as Kotelnik did also diminishes the win. And Kotelnik is a pretty run of the mill fighter himself.
None of this screams "impressive" to me.
LMAO,I know nothing Bradley does impresses you we get it..
But the "records" show that as a TKO so I'm guessing in your mind Froch "knocked him out"
Boxrec says that so...
Froch did knock him out, technically speaking. Are you having reading comprehension problems there? It's still fact. Nobody calls it a Froch loss do they?
Bradley did beat Manny technically but there were several rounds that were one sidedly in Pacs favor. That was absolutely not the case in the Alexander Kotelnik fight. Just because he did better than expected with some fast-well times jabs doesn't mean he took the title from the champion. It's not rocket science. Alexander was never buzzed or phazed at all and had landed harder shots. The cloe rounds went to Alexander on the cards and in my opinion. It's simple ****.
What the hell. What the hell.
At least watch a couple rounds of the fight and get it right that it was the right hand Kotelnik was blasting Alexander with while whooping his ass, rather than jabs.
Comment