WBC seems to be the most recognizable. truth is it's the most corrupt. one example, mayweather sucker punched his way to the 147 belt ages ago and he's still listed as their champ.
WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision.
WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher.
IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery.
it's all for good business i guess.
your thoughts?
WBO on the other hand strip fighters of belt all the time. pacquiao won against bradley, review commision even said so but they still did not reverse the decision.
WBA has two types of champion, a world champion and a "super" world champion. wtf? arum once said he had to pay them to have his fighters ranked higher.
IBF champions pretty much earn jack shit. they've been linked with racketeering and bribery.
it's all for good business i guess.
your thoughts?
Comment