Originally posted by jetgizo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why did Schaefer lie about the rematch clause?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Bushbaby View PostI'm not sure why this is such a big deal. The Broner rematch is the best thing for Maidana.
Some think he won, it was a damn close fight and Broner didn't exactly do alot to convincingly win it.
One rule for one person another for the next, price of knowing the right people!
Broner is a spoilt little twerp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Keitha313 View PostYet why didn't Paulie get a rematch?
Some think he won, it was a damn close fight and Broner didn't exactly do alot to convincingly win it.
One rule for one person another for the next, price of knowing the right people!
Broner is a spoilt little twerp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deeznuts View PostSo Schaefer just keeps lying wow. GB promotions are becoming scum of a promotion companyOriginally posted by Golovkin View PostSchaefer is a shady individual. I remember it clear as day, there was no rematch clause. Bet they thought they could slip that into the contract now somehow and Maidana and his team would have played along. Very happy to see Maidana stand his ground and sit back like he should evaluating his options.
He should demand a Mayweather fight or simply retire.
I think GBP just wanted it to look like there were options for Mayweather but Khan was always going to be the choice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money_May View PostAt the time he prob didn't want broner to have an immediate rematch with Maidana, thus, didn't want to disclose there was a rematch clause.
Comment
-
And why are ppl mad about it? Its clear as day Floyd has no interest in fighting maidana. If he did, he could make that fight if he wanted to. What else is out there better than broner ? Thurman is his mando but maidana seems to he keen on ducking him. Why don't ppl state that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deeznuts View PostCurious to know why Schaefer would lie about it. At first he says there was none now there is one. They are both promoted by GB so I'm sure he knew. So is it because they want Broner to avenge his loss to do some damage control to save their future ppv star? Or did he lie about the clause in the beginning thinking Maidana could potentially fight Floyd? Not sure why he would lie.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deeznuts View PostCurious to know why Schaefer would lie about it. At first he says there was none now there is one. They are both promoted by GB so I'm sure he knew. So is it because they want Broner to avenge his loss to do some damage control to save their future ppv star? Or did he lie about the clause in the beginning thinking Maidana could potentially fight Floyd? Not sure why he would lie.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathed View PostThat's the thing that gets me. Some people think one promoter is more of a good guy than another promoter and is really looking out for their fighters. All of these guys are in it to make money and will lie, cheat and steal to get it...same as a politician. Arum is bad but I actually think Schaefer is worse, the guy hides drug test results, downs all his competition and steals from his fighters (I'm surmising here but time will reveal more of his dirt).
I think GBP just wanted it to look like there were options for Mayweather but Khan was always going to be the choice.
I'd rather have them cut the nice company act, it would be easier to just pass these type of things as mere business moves.
Comment
Comment