Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wayne McCullough on Morales and Prince Naseem

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Exciterx22
    I think that has more to do with Erik's size advantage. Pacquiao could not overwhelm and bully Erik like he did to Barrera.
    do you think it safe to say that Erik hits as hard as MAB and vice versa ...

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by JOM'S
      do you think it safe to say that Erik hits as hard as MAB and vice versa ...
      Manny should now better, but I see Morales as a slightly better ****er than Barrera.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Exciterx22
        Manny should now better, but I see Morales as a slightly better ****er than Barrera.
        agree with you bro...

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by JOM'S
          agree with you bro...
          Do you agree that Barrera needs to beat both Chávez and Pacquiao if he wants to be seen as better than Morales??

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by 2000BC
            you know what I think is funny? Pacquaio fans are calling Barrera a ***** when he's moving up a division and taking on a very tough guy, and a champ at that(who just killed a guy in the ring).

            Man oh man he's a *****!
            If you call somebody out, say you'll take on the winner of a coming fight, generously offer to give the prospective opponent enough time to heal whatever wounds...talk the talk and then refuse to walk the walk, you're bound to be given names, none that smell sweet.

            Just a few minor questions: if Barrera is so eager to meet with destiny that he can't wait to face Chavez for an unprecedented (for a Mexican champ) 4th world title, why was the scheduled March meeting with Chavez announced as having been shoved days before Jan. 21? And, why was a challenge issued by Barrera to the winner of Morales-Pac? Did he forget his date with destiny for a while?

            Another minor question: why did he change his mind about meeting the winner of Morales-Pac after seeing what happened?

            Still another: if Chavez is so tough, why take him on instead of Pac? Taking on Pac would have made him keep his word and live up to the dare that he--or his spokesman--mouthed. There was no more problem with the Chavez fight because, as announced, it had been shelved anyway. Why resurrect if after Pac won? The Pac fight was what Barrera wanted, his or a Golden Boy promotions spokesman said. Why is he not doing what he said he wanted? Not to forget: he said he'd give the winner a chance to recuperate before meeting him. Pretty considerate of him. Both the fight and the consideration have obviously flown out of the window.

            I am NOT by any means one of those who has or is calling MAB names. I won't dare; I have too much respect for him. But, if others call him names, I won't jump. It's their take on the man, given the recent developments.

            Now, MAB is on his way to trying to get a 4th world crown. Good for him. But, he should have said that's what he wanted and not issue a dare.

            Note: if it was all the spokesman's gimmick, why isn't there a denial from MAB?
            Last edited by grayfist; 01-28-2006, 03:27 AM.

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Exciterx22
              Do you agree that Barrera needs to beat both Chávez and Pacquiao if he wants to be seen as better than Morales??
              i am not sure about this, Erik will have an argument that he also beat both Chavez and Pac ...

              i have to ride this all the way to the finish line and maybe a 4th will tell us that they are if they are equal or superior over the other ...

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by oldgringo
                your mother died and legally enititled me king **** you ****ing ****sucker.
                LOL

                I KNOW OG is a Morales fan who has ACUTALLY SEEN morales at those wieght and in those fights.Id be surprised if people like rsl have even ****ing seen the fights they claim to know so ****ing much about.Its beyond ****** how some people are taking the opportunity to discredit morales every chance they get since his loss.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by .::|ULTIMATE|::.
                  What i find that is funny is that it was Barrera's lack of fear that gave Manny pacquiao the opportunity to become a real star outside of his country, and Manny Pacquiao destroyed Barrera, and its some of the pacquiao fans demanding a rematch like if it had been the other way around i dont get that.
                  Yeah, as if the fight was close.

                  Well, I guess that's Pac fans' confidence in their man. I suppose they feel sure the rematch would be a replay of the first.

                  By the way, I am not at all sure that it was lack of fear that made Barrera take on Pacquiao. As I recall, Manny, after soundly beating Ledwaba, called out MAB, prompting experts to think either Manny was kidding or out of his mind. Barrera? Say, what? Some feared for Manny, not the least of whom are American boxing commentators. Few, if any, gave him a Chinaman's chance. More so because the fight was at Featherweight and Manny had just been KD'd his first time out at that weight before the eyes of his fellow countrymen at the Rizal Park in Manila. Barrera's camp may have thought: a "punk" like that ought to be taught a lesson.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by grayfist
                    Yeah, as if the fight was close.

                    Well, I guess that's Pac fans' confidence in their man. I suppose they feel sure the rematch would be a replay of the first.

                    By the way, I am not at all sure that it was lack of fear that made Barrera take on Pacquiao. As I recall, Manny, after soundly beating Ledwaba, called out MAB, prompting experts to think either Manny was kidding or out of his mind. Barrera? Say, what? Some feared for Manny, not the least of whom are American boxing commentators. Few, if any, gave him a Chinaman's chance. More so because the fight was at Featherweight and Manny had just been KD'd his first time out at that weight before the eyes of his fellow countrymen at the Rizal Park in Manila. Barrera's camp may have thought: a "punk" like that ought to be taught a lesson.
                    EXACTLY!!! RIGHT ON THE BUCKET.

                    And Boy! DId Barrera get a prime taste of real greatness. It's only fitting he bowed to his superior. And PAC taught him a leasson that he's way, way above ***** Barrera's league.

                    Now that ***** knows he can't handle the speed, he can't handle the powe, and come to think of it, PAC has become a very finesse fighter as of late, MAB pisses on his pants thinking PAC will KO him again.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by grayfist
                      Yeah, as if the fight was close.

                      Well, I guess that's Pac fans' confidence in their man. I suppose they feel sure the rematch would be a replay of the first.

                      By the way, I am not at all sure that it was lack of fear that made Barrera take on Pacquiao. As I recall, Manny, after soundly beating Ledwaba, called out MAB, prompting experts to think either Manny was kidding or out of his mind. Barrera? Say, what? Some feared for Manny, not the least of whom are American boxing commentators. Few, if any, gave him a Chinaman's chance. More so because the fight was at Featherweight and Manny had just been KD'd his first time out at that weight before the eyes of his fellow countrymen at the Rizal Park in Manila. Barrera's camp may have thought: a "punk" like that ought to be taught a lesson.
                      I don't know man see I remember Barrera saying he knew he had a tough opponent in front of him. Also I wasnt surprised at the outcome because i had seen Manny pacquiao before and knew he was definitely a force to be reckoned with.

                      Wouldnt a fighter like Barrera know that his opponent is very good because of the tapes he must watch in preparation for a fight?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP