Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tim Bradley: What must he do to earn your respect?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #241
    Originally posted by bballchump11 View Post
    which fights in particular do you think Bradley won because he headbutted his opponent?
    He's ducking your post.

    Comment

      #242
      Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
      He's ducking your post.
      I don't blame him because there's not much rationale in hating Bradley. The only legit reason I can see is him avoiding Khan and that was a business decision in order to set himself up for a more lucrative fight in Pacquiao

      Comment

        #243
        bradley is a warrior, and he'll always have a place in my heart for that, but he's overrated. ring ****zine sucks, but they've got the most looked at p4p list in the world, and they've got bradley 8th or 9th. what a joke that is.

        life and death with provodnikov. life and death.

        Comment

          #244
          Originally posted by New England View Post
          bradley is a warrior, and he'll always have a place in my heart for that, but he's overrated. ring ****zine sucks, but they've got the most looked at p4p list in the world, and they've got bradley 8th or 9th. what a joke that is.

          life and death with provodnikov. life and death.
          Is this some kinda of a joke??Bradley is on the P4P list(and imo should be higher)cause of overall resume and accomplishments..I dear you to tell me 3 fighters who should be on there over him..Base off their whole career..

          Comment

            #245
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            Is this some kinda of a joke??Bradley is on the P4P list(and imo should be higher)cause of overall resume and accomplishments..I dear you to tell me 3 fighters who should be on there over him..Base off their whole career..
            Guillermo Rigondeaux and Carl Froch are no brainers. I'd still put Donaire ahead of him, though that's not a no brainer.

            If Bradley's on there, it's 9th or 10th.

            Comment

              #246
              Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
              Guillermo Rigondeaux and Carl Froch are no brainers. I'd still put Donaire ahead of him, though that's not a no brainer.

              If Bradley's on there, it's 9th or 10th.
              Rigo with 12 wins does not belong on any P4P list at all..IMO Donaire does not belong on the P4P list either with the way he loss to Rigo..Froch is not on the P4P list already??If not he clearly belongs on there..Even tho Bradley is still more accomplish then Froch as well..

              P4P wtf are Broner and Alvarez..

              Comment

                #247
                So far all the undercard fights are potential opponents for the winner of the fight

                Comment

                  #248
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                  Rigo with 12 wins does not belong on any P4P list at all..IMO Donaire does not belong on the P4P list either with the way he loss to Rigo..Froch is not on the P4P list already??If not he clearly belongs on there..Even tho Bradley is still more accomplish then Froch as well..

                  P4P wtf are Broner and Alvarez..
                  Rigo is a no brainer. You don't dominate a top 5 p4per and not get on the list. And no, Froch is not on it. He belongs ahead of Bradley.

                  The final 3 of the Ring list is Broner, then Bradley, then Alvarez. Take the obviously biased Broner and Alvarez off that list and replace them with Rigo and Froch. Bradley could get in at 10th then, the top 7 all belong.

                  Comment

                    #249
                    Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                    Rigo is a no brainer. You don't dominate a top 5 p4per and not get on the list. And no, Froch is not on it. He belongs ahead of Bradley.

                    The final 3 of the Ring list is Broner, then Bradley, then Alvarez. Take the obviously biased Broner and Alvarez off that list and replace them with Rigo and Froch. Bradley could get in at 10th then, the top 7 all belong.
                    I just can't agree that a fighter with 12 wins belongs anywhere on the P4P list..To each it's own tho..Froch belongs,ahead of Bradley can't agree with that..Bradley is more accomplished then Froch which is one of the main things I base my P4P list on..I would not argue to hard on it tho..Broner and Alvarez or not on my list..Bradley is about 7th or 6th..Rigo is also out..I stand strong,12 wins..Not enough of a story imo..

                    Comment

                      #250
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                      I just can't agree that a fighter with 12 wins belongs anywhere on the P4P list..To each it's own tho..Froch belongs,ahead of Bradley can't agree with that..Bradley is more accomplished then Froch which is one of the main things I base my P4P list on..I would not argue to hard on it tho..Broner and Alvarez or not on my list..Bradley is about 7th or 6th..Rigo is also out..I stand strong,12 wins..Not enough of a story imo..
                      The *** does it matter how many fights he's had? Rigondeaux absolutely schooled a top 5 p4p fighter. Made him look like a bum. He's done what Bradley has never and will never do in his 12th fight.

                      And skill wise? LOL....Bradley looks like a 12 fight novice in comparison.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP