Originally posted by ИATAS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Loeffler: Andre Ward-Gennady Golovkin Will Take Time
Collapse
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostMan, I appreciate you and I think you're a reasonable person. Don't waste your time on these assh0les. Life will put them where they belong. Use your time and intelligence to take you further in life.
Hey NATAS, what your friend here is saying is you need to give up and bow out gracefully while you have a chance to save face.
NATAS and Maxi's logic isn't even adding up.
Our buddy Tom Loeffler gave an exclusive interview to boxingscene where he honestly told us that GGG vs Ward isn't a smart business move. He also said the Ward fight needed at least a year or so to build.
But what NATAS and Maxi is telling us is that before Tom gave this interview, Andre Ward had already turned down the fight, Tom just forgot to mention it.
Now out of all the best most notable GGG cuckhold's, I find it very hard to believe that even they believe that. But these guys know no bounds to go through to defend that GGG cokkLast edited by Chollo Vista; 07-04-2016, 12:32 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostI'm doing quite well for myself, actually. Thank you.
Hey NATAS, what your friend here is saying is you need to give up and bow out gracefully while you have a chance to save face.
NATAS and Maxi's logic isn't even adding up.
Our buddy Tom Loeffler gave an exclusive interview to boxingscene where he honestly told us that GGG vs Ward isn't a smart business move. He also said the Ward fight needed at least a year or so to build.
But what NATAS and Maxi is telling us is that before Tom gave this interview, Andre Ward had already turned down the fight, Tom just forgot to mention it.
Now out of all the best most notable GGG cuckhold's, I find it very hard to believe that even they believe that. But these guys know no bounds to go through to defend that GGG cokk
Jacobs is refusing to fight someone in his own division, which is a total different case. To make it worst he's the mandatory.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostSo let me understand this. You don't have an official quote from boxingscene or a more reputable site where K2 offered Ward a fight at 168, all you have is GGG saying they did and Ward said no?
Listening to this interview where Tom Loeffler laid it all on the line, does that even remotely make any sense to you??
I understand you're a GGG cuckhold, but let's be realistic.
I also showed you a video where GGG said "Ward is too much for me", but you're peddaling the idea that Ward turned GGG down before Tom Loeffler gave this interview?
If that's the case why didn't Loeffler say in this interview "We offered Jacobs a fight a few months ago, but he turned it down?"
He didn't say it because it never happend.
Ladies and Gentlemen of the court, I provide exhibit D - where the GGG cuckholds know no bounds or limits or length's they will go to to defend their cuckhold for the business decisions he's made.
Ain't no mountain high enough, ain't no valley low enough to prevent the GGG cuckhold's from defending that cokk
Look man, I get it. You've been talking about how Jacobs will KO Golovkin for a couple years now so of course it's disappointing to hear him say he doesn't want the fight, I get it. No need to waste everyone's time trying to convince us Jacobs made a "smart business decision" by passing on Golovkin and fighting the legendary Sergio Mora. Yesterday it was Jacobs deserves $3-$5 million now it's about Ward lmao whatever man, keep telling yourself you're doing a good job changing the minds of everyone who completely ****ted on Jacobs on social media, even his own fans were calling him out!
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostJacobs is refusing to fight someone in his own division, which is a total different case. To make it worst he's the mandatory.
Sad thing is there are so called boxing fans that defend this kind of crap which is the very same crap that destroys the sport.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostWhy even talk to you if this is the way you're going to act talking like a childish gay kid and not even comment on my points? You want to debate a quote from Golovkin himself and ignore my entire points about how Ward has literally nothing to do with Jacobs? Fuck out of here with that bull****. As I said, you've been going on and on for days now trying to defend Jacobs' decision NOT to fight Golovkin and all you got left is reaching for straws about how Golovkin didn't move up in weight for Andre Ward.
Look man, I get it. You've been talking about how Jacobs will KO Golovkin for a couple years now so of course it's disappointing to hear him say he doesn't want the fight, I get it. No need to waste everyone's time trying to convince us Jacobs made a "smart business decision" by passing on Golovkin and fighting the legendary Sergio Mora. Yesterday it was Jacobs deserves $3-$5 million now it's about Ward lmao whatever man, keep telling yourself you're doing a good job changing the minds of everyone who completely ****ted on Jacobs on social media, even his own fans were calling him out!
Since 2014 Jacobs has always said he wants the right money for GGG.
Jacobs trainer even said earlier this year that the plan was to have Saunders in the summer and GGG right after. BJS turned down Jacobs for whatever reason. I never said anything about $$$ being the reason so stop lying.
Anyway, Jacobs is simply saying that GGG is obviously the best in the weight class. But the $$$ isn't right. I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.
Loeffler said Lara at 160 didn't make financial sense therefore they won't consider Lara. Jacobs is saying the $$$ isn't right. Let's wait until the negotiation details are made public before you start finger pointing.
Team GGG has publicly stated on several occasions that they've made smart business decisions. But because NATAS and Co thinks GGG is the only one that can make smart business decisions everyone else is suppose to just throw their career out the window and say fcuk it, right?
I'm still waiting on the WBA to mandate the fight. If the WBA does their job and mandates the fight, yes Jacobs has no choice but to take the fight.
But until that happens, he has every right to make smart business decisions just as GGG and the next man have made.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostWard has literally nothing to do with Jacobs?
Regarding Jacobs and GGG being in the same weight class, Pac and Mayweather were in the same weight class for years. Pac turned down the biggest fight in boxing history and a purse of 40 million dollars to fight Bradley for 26 million because the "business" wasn't right. But anybody that turns down a fight against someone in their own weight class because the money isn't right, it's an automatic duck even though they made the same business decision that you previously approved for another fighter.
That's what you call arbitrary decision making and it's unjust.
Now if the WBA will hurry up and mandate the fight, we won't be having this conversation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostI hear your points, you just don't hear anything resembling someone else making business decisions outside of GGG or Pac.
Since 2014 Jacobs has always said he wants the right money for GGG.
Jacobs trainer even said earlier this year that the plan was to have Saunders in the summer and GGG right after. BJS turned down Jacobs for whatever reason. I never said anything about $$$ being the reason so stop lying.
Anyway, Jacobs is simply saying that GGG is obviously the best in the weight class. But the $$$ isn't right. I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.
Loeffler said Lara at 160 didn't make financial sense therefore they won't consider Lara. Jacobs is saying the $$$ isn't right. Let's wait until the negotiation details are made public before you start finger pointing.
Team GGG has publicly stated on several occasions that they've made smart business decisions. But because NATAS and Co thinks GGG is the only one that can make smart business decisions everyone else is suppose to just throw their career out the window and say fcuk it, right?
I'm still waiting on the WBA to mandate the fight. If the WBA does their job and mandates the fight, yes Jacobs has no choice but to take the fight.
But until that happens, he has every right to make smart business decisions just as GGG and the next man have made.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostYou're not seriously trying to go back to your thread about Pac wanting more than $40 million for a Mayweather fight,
Let me say it again businessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbu sinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusi nessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusine ss
What don't you understand about the analogy I'm making with all these examples is businessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusinessbusiness.
Have I mentioned business?
Why can't you get it through your thick ass skull that all these fighters from some time or another have made business decisions for their careers?
GGG has made several.
Bob Arum tried to tell Mayweather how much he was worth and didn't know schit.
FMJ tried to tell Pac how much he was worth and didn't know schit.
You are not a boxing insider. You don't have the right to tell a boxer how much he feels he should get paid. And if you do, please tell me what experience you have in said field and who's boxing contract you negotiated on behalf of? You haven't and you have zero negotiating boxing experience.
You have no right to tell us why Pac was ok to make a smart business decision and GGG made a right business decision, but no one else can.
The fact that after all these hours of telling you about "business", you're literally struggling to grasp that concept.
Do you really believe I'm comparing Jacobs star power to that of Pacquiao? Are you seriously that ******ed???
I'm giving countless examples of business practices you've co-signed on since being a member of this forum, but now all of a sudden you have a problem with business.Last edited by Chollo Vista; 07-04-2016, 01:48 AM.
Comment
Comment