How's your Top 10 P4P look now???

[thuggery]

Ward
Martinez
Marquez
Wlad
Mayweather

Put them in any order you wish, those are the names in my top 5.

[Bolo Punch]

1) broner (more advanced than floyd was at this age by far)
2) floyd ( needs to fight canelo next it still a beast and p4p king)
3) canelo( gonna ko trout a** back to wherever he came
4) Marquez ( distorted Pacroids normal sleeping routine. Sent him night night)
5) LUCIAN bute ( he was killing froch until that controversial stoppage. Froch got lucky and ducking the rematch. Had it a shutout in favor of bute before the ko.)
6) danny garcia ( Judah getting put in a body bag and then matthyse next)
7) rigo ( schooled the Filipino flash and proved he wasn't just hyped)
8) mikey garcia ( dudes a beast and has unexpected power.
9) chaves jr ( wasn't focused vs martinez could've koed his ass easily as seen in round 12)
10) tim bradley( I love Timmy has so much heart)


Ward, sergio,PAC and nonito are just awful. Ward just headbuttsthroughout the whole fight as noted be Kessler, Martinez ran from chaves, PAC sleeps during fights and nonito disappointed me.

[Kingjames6Flee]

Everything I stated was factual fool, perhaps you should pay attention to boxing and you'd see my point

[dibzvincent143]

1.mayweather
2.ward
3.marquez
4.rigondeaux
5.martinez
6.pacquiao
7.bradley
8.wlad
9.mares
10.hopkins

[Mr. Philadel]

1..Ward
2..Mayweather/Marquez
3..Martinez
4..Wlad
5..Froch
6..Bradley
7..Pac
8..Rigo
9..Mares
10..Donaire

[Lords]

Floyd is #1 p4p
Manny is not on the list
Ward is top 3 p4p
Rigo is not in the top 5 period
Bernard is not on the list

[Gudfella]

how can ppl not put wlad..he's the most dominate in his division...nd has been for almost a decade...Danny Garcia kod khan...nd took his titles...nd ward is dominating his division...my p4p isn't based on past resumes...but its the WHAT HAVE U DONE FOR ME LATELY attitude..but aganst elite fighters not koing abunch of no bodys..marquez kod pacquio...but a pac that is fading and had lost to bradley...although Garcia beat some one that had already lost...he took titles from khan...if listers were basing there list on resumes...bhop would still b # 1..if money gets past the ghost then he could get his status back...nd martinez...how can he not b in the top 3...multiple defenses...nd fighting elite...rigo should enter in the low ranks...he beat donaire who had rank blasting out titlest in a couple weight classes...Bradley still ddnt lose his titles



Posted from krikya360.com App for Android

[IronDanHamza]

What do you mean he's not the undisputed #1 P4P in the world? Over the last three years he has fought a shot Cotto (and got his nose crushed), quitter Ortiz (KO'd by Maidana later Josesito), and is soon to prove his P4P supremacy against Guerrero (looked like **** in his only two 147 fights). Who have the other P4P fighters fought in that same 3-4 year timeframe? lol

Isn't that the same Cotto who is the only reason Austin Trout is now considered to be a Top fighter? And despite Trout clearly winning, Cotto did some damage.

[mathed]

1. Mayweather
2. Martinez
3. Ward
4. JMM
5. Wlad
6. Bradley
7. Froch
8. Rigo
9. Pac
10. BHOP

Guerrero/Mares/Donaire/

[New England]

p4p is about skill level. Who would you pick to beat Ward in a head for head matchup all things being equal?

Pacquiao is faded, Marquez is faded, neither of them would win a fight with Ward if they were all the same size, he is too fresh, to smart, and to crafty.

Its not some title where you have to get beaten to lose your ranking, its about how well you can perform now.

p4p is about the current state of your accomplishments, and the prospective value you lend to those accomplishments in a fictitious h2h matchup that takes place if all fighters were of the same size.

"if everybody was the same size, who would come out on top over anybody in his next fight."

"skills" are far too subjective, even for boxing.

you don't watch a video of a fighter tooling on a bum and say "his skills are the best in the game, he's the best p4p fighter."


that's why it's based on accomplishments.