Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: Broner Not a Big Lightweight, He Fought Bums

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    From an article on Mosley talking about Pacs power

    "Pacquiao has some pretty good punching power. He has some different hitting power. He's not physically strong, but he hits pretty good, like he has a good snap or something. He's got something in his hands where he just, pop, and you can wobble. He can hurt you...I don't know how he throws his punches, but he does something where when he lands, it has a different impact. I mean, I get hit by, even now, I get hit by bigger guys all the time and there's no dazing, I don't wobble, I don't do any of that stuff. I don't feel like I'm getting ready to wobble or anything. With Pacquiao, he just touches you and you're already wobbling. It's not like he's heavy-handed. He's not heavy-handed. It's weird. It's the weirdest thing,"

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by ManOnTheMoon View Post
      Broner is trememdous and he is taking a big risk going up to face Paulie which I respect, but his opposition so far is not impressive at all, Paul is right. The fans that want to say "he beat the #1 guy" or "he beat world champions", you are all just tools for promoters, stop looking at the ridiculous belts and rankings and use you own eyes to decide if a fighter is good or not, stop being fools.
      Dude you must be poppn molly's and blazing on that LOUD this morning! Big risk? Paulie is nothing more then a sacrificial lamb for stars on the rise. He beat NOBODY of any significance. Before you say "neither did Broner" nope but the jury is still out on his career. Paulie is a overhyped fighter who made a career outta being an "opponent" and not a "component"

      Big Risk would of been fighting one of those cannons at the division just south of 47 now that's a RISK!

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by dan_cov View Post

        Paulie had a broken jaw against Cotto and still finished the fight!

        There is nothing wrong with Paulie's chin or heart and never has been.
        Does your comment mean Paulie has a chin or Cotto has no punch? They both can't be true, can they? I mean, if you can't take out a guy with a broken jaw, you don't have much of a punch, do you?

        Anyway, guys on this link think Cotto hit harder than Tyson, Hearns, Foreman, Shavers and Lyle. Go figure.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by kmas-ski View Post
          Dude you must be poppn molly's and blazing on that LOUD this morning! Big risk? Paulie is nothing more then a sacrificial lamb for stars on the rise. He beat NOBODY of any significance. Before you say "neither did Broner" nope but the jury is still out on his career. Paulie is a overhyped fighter who made a career outta being an "opponent" and not a "component"

          Big Risk would of been fighting one of those cannons at the division just south of 47 now that's a RISK!
          One of the best posts ever. It got me to thinking: When was the last time an overly-hyped, highly promoted, up-and-coming fighter got beat by a fighter who is over-the-hill, has no punch, can't beat any other major contender in his own division, and is simply cashing in his title for money?

          Canelo vs. Trout also falls in this category.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by marvin douglas View Post
            Does your comment mean Paulie has a chin or Cotto has no punch? They both can't be true, can they? I mean, if you can't take out a guy with a broken jaw, you don't have much of a punch, do you?

            Anyway, guys on this link think Cotto hit harder than Tyson, Hearns, Foreman, Shavers and Lyle. Go figure.
            Know when to quit bro... It'll serve you well

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by marvin douglas View Post
              Does your comment mean Paulie has a chin or Cotto has no punch? They both can't be true, can they? I mean, if you can't take out a guy with a broken jaw, you don't have much of a punch, do you?

              Anyway, guys on this link think Cotto hit harder than Tyson, Hearns, Foreman, Shavers and Lyle. Go figure.
              You are kind of coming off as a hater dude. Cotto was not a bomber but at 140 he definitely had some pop. And Paulie has a great chin and has proven it many times. I mean A broken jaw is no joke and to keep fighting with that kind of injury, especially to finish the fight is pretty damn Boss in my book.

              Comment


                #37
                Bunch of clowns in this topic

                Comment


                  #38
                  Paulie keeps talking so much about Broner's height that I think he's forgot that he lost to Hatton who's exactly the same height as Broner at 5'6 1/2 only Broner hits harder is faster and has more skill than Hatton. Face it Paulie, the blueprint to beat you is there it's just a matter of time now

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
                    I usually like Paulie, but how are Ponce and DeMarco bums??? Ponce has since gone on to get good wins and another title, and DeMarco was the #1 at 135.
                    Those are the only two fighters that Broner fought that weren't bums, but tbh i thought Ponce beat broker and made him look rather ordinary, but the Demarco win still stands.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by wizard king View Post
                      Bunch of clowns in this topic
                      that's not very nice

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP