Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tito and Hopkins maybe in September

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by borikua
    I'm not crying or making excuses...I just think that Tito can beat Nard in a rematch...flat out better than Tito? So he is flat out better than DLH too?...Nard is not even close to Tito's legacy in boxing...

    tito is great but you are bias as hell, nard 20 straight defenses, tito could never match that, nard beat tito head to head, he knocked his ass out, he could not have continued in that fight, nard, all time great

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
      I never said anything about the Tito/Hopkins fight.
      De La Hoya ran like a lil girl, you dont run for nothing.
      Execpt when you lose then its ok to tuck your tail and run away from the entire sport huh

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by borikua
        I'm not crying or making excuses...I just think that Tito can beat Nard in a rematch...flat out better than Tito? So he is flat out better than DLH too?...Nard is not even close to Tito's legacy in boxing...

        YES

        Hopkins is flat out better than anyone 168 and down and YES again Hopkins legacy is better than Tito's

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by GodzHand
          you make some good points. with all issues withstanding, he should have been able to keep his head concentrated on the task at hand (Hopkins), i think he will do better than last time for the first few rounds, but Hopkins is going to break him down. Oscar did a better job against Hopkins than Tito did, and I dont think Tito will even do as decent as Oscar did. He will do better than their first fight though.
          What's up Godz...that's what I mean, I think that he can do a better fight than the first...about DLH doing a better job against Nard that Tito, I think that Nard gave DLH to much respect the first rounds (or he was waiting for DLH to get tired),I don't agree that he did better than Tito...

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
            I never said anything about the Tito/Hopkins fight.
            De La Hoya ran like a lil girl, you dont run for nothing.

            Like I said, you dont outland your opponent by one HUNDRED punches by running like a girl. I like Tito and Oscar the same. Oscar made Tito look ordinary for the first 10 rounds of that fight, he was making tito miss and countering Tito's MISSES with sharp, quick combinations. He stayed away at the end because he was exhausted. No one wants to get knocked out, and if your in a boxing match and your exhausted, you better stay away. ESPECIALLY if you outlanded your opponent by ONE HUNDRED punches. Im not hating on Tito, but you guys gotta stop idolizing him, he is a magnificent fighter who is destined for the hall of fame, but dont follow him blindly into the fire. By fire I mean Bernard Hopkins. Who wants some Tequilla?

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by jose
              Execpt when you lose then its ok to tuck your tail and run away from the entire sport huh
              Another issue, another topic. I'm sorry, but DLH ran like a lil girl.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by borikua
                What's up Godz...that's what I mean, I think that he can do a better fight than the first...about DLH doing a better job against Nard that Tito, I think that Nard gave DLH to much respect the first rounds (or he was waiting for DLH to get tired),I don't agree that he did better than Tito...

                Bernard did give Oscar too much respect, but Oscar won at least 3 rounds out of that fight, so he had to do better than Tito, I dont think Tito won a single round against bernard, and it was hard to watch that being a fan of Tito. But at least you make sense, not like some of the Tito fans that think he's God. Karma for you.

                Comment


                  #48
                  i think everyone agrees that tito is great, but nard is so dam dedicated and smart he uses tito's aggression against him, only way tito beats him is if nard gets old before they fight again, thats the only way

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by jose
                    YES

                    Hopkins is flat out better than anyone 168 and down and YES again Hopkins legacy is better than Tito's
                    Hopkins has only two big wins, how is that better than Titos record? If Roy Jones never moved up in weight, he could of done the same as Hopkins, and kill his career.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
                      Hopkins has only two big wins, how is that better than Titos record? If Roy Jones never moved up in weight, he could of done the same as Hopkins, and kill his career.

                      Are you really comparing legacies? The answer to that is Hopkin's INSANE title defenses, which is a record in the history books now. The word "If" is meaningless, because Roy didnt stay there to "kill" Hopkin's career. You are truly blind if you think that Tito is more accomplished than Bernard.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP