How many losses does Floyd Mayweather Jr have against SRL'S WW resume?

[UTEP]

Floyd's best weight was 130 though. The 98-01 Floyd doesn't lose to any other Super Featherweight. I don't care what anyone says.

Who cares about bastard divisions like 130.

[Outwest Exp 355]

LOL. LOL. LOL. Did you see what SRL did to Green and Price with one punch? His one punch KO of Green had him out cold for a few minutes. Price was a guy that lasted the distance with the punching power of Cuevas and Palomino, yet SRL took him out in one round.

Leonard also Ko'd Hearns and Benitez as a WW, who the F*** has Mayweather Ko'd as a WW that even comes close to those guys?

As for defense he was the master of using lateral movement and distance, he would have used his superior size and reach to jab Mayweather. Leonard would walk though Mayweather's punches, for god's sake the man went the distance with Duran, Geraldo, Hagler-----------you think SRL would fear Mayweather?

As for Mayweather being too skilled? Do you know that Benitez as for pure slipping ability is much more elusive than Mayweather. Benitez didn't have a great chin, yet he went the distance with Hearns. Watch the final 12 seconds of Benitez-Hearns in round 2, tell me if you think Mayweather would have slipped those 20 rapid fire blows that Hearns spitted out at Benitez? BTW, Hearns was a master boxer who even out boxed Benitez with a broken hand, and you think Mayweather would be too good and sharp for SRL?

Leonards defense was lateral movement. Thats basically what I said. But he was very hitable. And Leonard wasnt walking through nobodies punches. He was a pretty boy who hated getting hit. So lets keep it real. His defense was spotty and he has the eye surgeries to prove that. Benitez was a great defense fighter but he never had Floyds punching accuracy. And im not nobodies Alt im mutha****in me.

[bigflip55]

Mayweather-Duran at 147 (Floyd-Judah version and Duran-Leonard I version) would be a classic fight. It'd be a SD/MD and a very close fight.

Mayweather was too small to beat Leonard or Hearns. Those guys were big WW's, I mean Leonard was big enough to fight Marvin Hagler at 160, can you imagine what Floyd would look like at 160???

ray isnt really that big, ive met him a few time before through pepe (his old trainer) and ray is shorter than me with a small build and im a small mw 5'10. Id post a pick of me and him but i dont know how, if someone wants to tell me how ill put it up asap

[bigflip55]

Mayweather-Duran at 147 (Floyd-Judah version and Duran-Leonard I version) would be a classic fight. It'd be a SD/MD and a very close fight.

Mayweather was too small to beat Leonard or Hearns. Those guys were big WW's, I mean Leonard was big enough to fight Marvin Hagler at 160, can you imagine what Floyd would look like at 160???

ray isnt really that big, ive met him a few time before through pepe (his old trainer) and ray is shorter than me with a small build and im a small mw 5'10. Id post a pick of me and him but i dont know how, if someone wants to tell me how ill put it up asap

[jvsnypes]

Leonards defense was lateral movement. Thats basically what I said. But he was very hitable. And Leonard wasnt walking through nobodies punches. He was a pretty boy who hated getting hit. So lets keep it real. His defense was spotty and he has the eye surgeries to prove that. Benitez was a great defense fighter but he never had Floyds punching accuracy. And im not nobodies Alt im mutha****in me.

Dude,I respect your passion for Floyd and his skills. Floyd has accomplished a lot in his career. I agree with you that Hearns would have been his toughest opponent at WW because of his height and reach and overall boxing ability. But I think that Hearns would completely destroy Floyd. Floyd, as great as he is defensively, has no answer for a good jab. Hearns had a great jab and one of the deadliest right hands ever in boxing history to follow it. I don't think it would even be that competetive. I've watched Floyd walk fighters down in the past, but walking down Hearns would be suicidal. Floyd would have never taken this fight.

But when it comes down to Floyd "Money" Mayweather fighting who I think is the best all around fighter in the history of this sport, Sugar Ray Leonard, he makes it interesting but still gets beaten. You make it seem as though Ray was one dimensional and was only effective fighting 1 style. Go back and watch how he fought Benetiz and then compare it to how he fought Hearns and Hagler. 3 different styles. You say Mayweather is versitile??? Well, maybe. I've seen Floyd fight a defensive fight and pot shot his opponents, beating them on points. I've watched him walk flatfooted fighters down throwing harder shots. But never have I watched him do either against fighters the caliber of Duran, Hearns,or Benetiz. Its just a completely different era. And to say that he beats Ray Leonard with ease...dude, go get Ray's career dvd set. Floyd would have never came up to WW in that era. Yeah Ray could be hit, but what does that mean if Floyd couldn't hurt him. Floyd would get beat up and humiliated if he tried to walk Ray down. That's almost hilarious. His best chance would be to fight him as he did Oscar. A semi retired and slower Oscar only lost by a split decision. Had he kept using his jab for 12 rounds, Oscar would have won by UD. So what happens with an all around better and more disciplined fighter like Ray? I'll tell you. The same outcome Floyd's dad suffered when he fought Sugar.

[JAB5239]

At least 2 to Hearns and Duran. Benitez is a maybe I would be more comfortable picking at 154.

[StarshipTrooper]

Leonards defense was lateral movement. Thats basically what I said. But he was very hitable. And Leonard wasnt walking through nobodies punches. He was a pretty boy who hated getting hit. So lets keep it real. His defense was spotty and he has the eye surgeries to prove that. Benitez was a great defense fighter but he never had Floyds punching accuracy. And im not nobodies Alt im mutha****in me.

I'm sorry but you're coming through all garbled what with Floyd's nuts in your mouth and all :jerk0ff9:

Poet

[Outwest Exp 355]

I'm sorry but you're coming through all garbled what with Floyd's nuts in your mouth and all :jerk0ff9:

Poet

Is that the best you got. You cant even back your troll statements with any kind of intellegent boxing analyst. Just lean over and choke yourself.

[Outwest Exp 355]

Dude,I respect your passion for Floyd and his skills. Floyd has accomplished a lot in his career. I agree with you that Hearns would have been his toughest opponent at WW because of his height and reach and overall boxing ability. But I think that Hearns would completely destroy Floyd. Floyd, as great as he is defensively, has no answer for a good jab. Hearns had a great jab and one of the deadliest right hands ever in boxing history to follow it. I don't think it would even be that competetive. I've watched Floyd walk fighters down in the past, but walking down Hearns would be suicidal. Floyd would have never taken this fight.

But when it comes down to Floyd "Money" Mayweather fighting who I think is the best all around fighter in the history of this sport, Sugar Ray Leonard, he makes it interesting but still gets beaten. You make it seem as though Ray was one dimensional and was only effective fighting 1 style. Go back and watch how he fought Benetiz and then compare it to how he fought Hearns and Hagler. 3 different styles. You say Mayweather is versitile??? Well, maybe. I've seen Floyd fight a defensive fight and pot shot his opponents, beating them on points. I've watched him walk flatfooted fighters down throwing harder shots. But never have I watched him do either against fighters the caliber of Duran, Hearns,or Benetiz. Its just a completely different era. And to say that he beats Ray Leonard with ease...dude, go get Ray's career dvd set. Floyd would have never came up to WW in that era. Yeah Ray could be hit, but what does that mean if Floyd couldn't hurt him. Floyd would get beat up and humiliated if he tried to walk Ray down. That's almost hilarious. His best chance would be to fight him as he did Oscar. A semi retired and slower Oscar only lost by a split decision. Had he kept using his jab for 12 rounds, Oscar would have won by UD. So what happens with an all around better and more disciplined fighter like Ray? I'll tell you. The same outcome Floyd's dad suffered when he fought Sugar.

Hearns is the tougher matchup for sure. But he lacks in boxing IQ and he never had the legs. He let fighters like Leonard and Hagler get him into slugfest with didnt benefit hit at all. And I wont give Hearns the benefit of the doubt because of that.
As far as Leonard goes everybody looks at Floyd now and tries to compare that against Leonard at his best. I dont do that. So I would easily take Floyd post multiple hand surgeries over Leonard post eye surgery. I respect your opinion but Ill stick to my own.

[!! Shawn]

Hagler, Hearns, and Duran.

Would be close with Benitez, but I think FLoyd could pull off points in that one, maybe.