Would you rather a fighter be active or fight every once in awhile

[hugh grant]

To be p4p rated you have to be active. Of course sometimes that is not possible but dont make a habit of fighting once in a blue moon like one particular fighter.

[kiaba360]

He has fought 3 title fights this year,how can you be mad at that?

Read the next sentence, "People are criticizing Donaire/Arce on its own merit, not taking into account the bigger picture." Some fans are relentless and will not give a fuck how much a guy has fought. They only care if he's fighting solid/worthy opposition every-time he fights.

Personally, I didn't particularly like Vasquez as an opponent, but it was Nonito's first fight at the weight and it was for a title, so I let it slide. Arce is the type of opponent that Donaire is capable of thoroughly out-classing and is capable of finishing his career in one night. Mismatches lead to big expectations, which will lead to the fighter falling short beneath those expectations and then he'll get discredited.

[-PBP-]

Active. I like what Donaire has done this year.

[hugh grant]

For instance floyd only has to fight once in a very, very long while and he immediately becomes at least no2 p4p after one decent performance. That pattern of behaviour shouldnt be advized, as it promotes laziness in a fighter and has no benefit to fans who want to watch a fighter.

It is a loophole Floyd has taken advantage of for too long now. Just cos its not against the law what Floyd is doing dont mean to say its right.

[al-Xander]

If you just stream fights for free, why do you care? We all know that when it's not a super fight, most posters in this site, which includes this TS, are just streaming fights. How is this sport going to flourish if you're just watching fights for free?

[rasdun]

who would complaun about a fighter being active? r u sure ur not taking it our of context - maybe someones complainin about choice of opponent- i have a very hard time believing that someone complained that a fighter was fighting too often

[eurochamp]

If you just stream fights for free, why do you care? We all know that when it's not a super fight, most posters in this site, which includes this TS, are just streaming fights. How is this sport going to flourish if you're just watching fights for free?

Let me ask you,what do you know about me? and what is a stream?

[rasdun]

There are many reasons to complain about the sport. Especially when you see gift decisions given out too often. Also, too many titles keep alot of big fights from happening and greedy promoters keeping things in house is another good reason to complain. I think this is where most of the complaining comes from. In reference to the sport itself of boxing, I love it.

very true - I love the sport, but there r a lot of problems, exs 1 and 2, 2 of the most powerful people in the sport: mayweather and Arum

1. Mayweather only cares about taking fights he knows he'll win easily and thats why he wont fight Pac, who he deems a risk, much less Martinez.

2. Arum doesn't care about the health of the sport and will only match his fighters with other TR fighters.

so, I can understand why people may complain but still love the sport. in fact, it makes sense.

[al-Xander]

Let me ask you,what do you know about me? and what is a stream?

Show me a list of non super fights have you watched with pay? Show me.

[hugh grant]

Miguel can beat Foreman and Margarito and it dont garantuee Miguel p4p status. Floyd only has to beat Miguel and that seems to garantee Floyd p4p status?
That is more pressure on Miguel and no pressure on Floyd as Floyd knows he only has to put in one good performance once in a very long while.
Well let me tell you its harder to win 2 fights like Miguel did than it is Floyds one win against Miguel as Floyd beating Miguel dont mean hed beat Foreman and margarito.

Triangle theories dont work and dont apply, so why would Floyd retain some kind of reserved spot he seems to have and shouldnt have.?