the real reason why pacquiao could'nt ko bradley is because he's one dimensional.and when its not working then he does'nt know what else to do. nor does his suppose to be great trainer.anybody that knows boxing should've seen this based on all 3 marquez fights.Ali once said that if you can't adjust then you can't win.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bradley Sr: If No Injury, Pacquiao Would've Been KO'd!
Collapse
-
so tired of this "look at me" "excuse making" attitude of boxers and their team. Bradley should have been able to handle a past his prime, bad legs Pacquiao. He couldnt.
It's easy dominating Lamont Peterson, but fighting an elite ATG is a whole different story
Comment
-
Big man done lost his right mind..your son got out boxed by a dude who literally took the night off and fought according to all the "real boxing fans" a total of 45 seconds per round. I was expecting an upset in this fight but let's be honest the only upset that happened was in the judging aspect..for someone with "torn" ligaments and 10% of his movement available Bradley jr sure did a hell of a lot of running around in the last 8 rounds. Look I wanted bradley to shine in this fight..he didn't..his injuries if you look closely could not have affected him that much..i'm sorry to those who don't agree but he was moving a hell of a lot for someone with "two broken feet". Pacquaio has gotten lazy..I think he like many others expected the fight to be lopsided and for bradley to be more defensive then offensive and probably I think bradley would've done a better performance being reactive and counter punching instead of hitting as much empty air as he did. I had hopes for the kid but he really showed how limited he is in the first fight..I do hope a second one happens because I think he'd win if pacquaio half asses his training again. Can anyone recall pacquiao looking this flabby/pudgy before?
Comment
-
the problem i have with this BS is that Pacquiao after Marquez 3 wasnt thumping and beating his chest about getting a gift decision.
Pac knew he was lucky and kept silent. He kept silent even after getting robbed himself and wasnt crying like a b*tch
Folks here who support Bradley and his father running their mouths have some sort of double standard
Comment
-
Originally posted by devildg View Postso tired of this "look at me" "excuse making" attitude of boxers and their team. Bradley should have been able to handle a past his prime, bad legs Pacquiao. He couldnt.
It's easy dominating Lamont Peterson, but fighting an elite ATG is a whole different story
Comment
-
-
FACT #1 - The Pac Bradley fight was the greatest ROBBERY in modern times.
FACT # 2 - Bradley would Not have had those injury's if he had NOT been fighting PAC
FACT # 3 - Bradley was given a gift of two rounds by Pac as Pac won the other ten
the END !!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by RockyB View PostWhat the **** is wrong with people? Pacquiao was robbed, the Bradleys know it. They are just hurting themselves and their rep by saying ****** **** like this! And as for the KO, NO. Pacquiao could go twelve rounds with Bradley without punching him and still survive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chargerhemi06 View PostBack then pac still had options. And the 40 million offer with no ppv, come on now i dont even want to go there.
Pac doesnt have options now besides marquez and bradley. Cotto made it clear he is not doing a catchweight.
In my opinion, bradley needs another fight with pacquiao more than pac needs a rematch. Bradley is trying to be a ppv fighter and he is at a brick wall until he convincingly beats pacquiao.
Comment
Comment