don't understand the problem with this fight. the first 3 were good and none of them had a clear winner. we don't need a 4th one because it will be good and close too? thats ******. this is a good fight. way better than bradley.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Marquez Deal is Close For 12/8, Says Beltran
Collapse
-
-
Something tells me, this will end in controversy. Just got a gut feeling, smh.
I'll keep my money unless Mikey is in it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big_L View Postdon't understand the problem with this fight. the first 3 were good and none of them had a clear winner. we don't need a 4th one because it will be good and close too? thats ******. this is a good fight. way better than bradley.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Perro View PostNone of that applies when Pac himself said he'd fight on May 5th, as long as Mayweather gave an equal and fair split.
Manny Pacquiao Agrees to May 5 and 50/50 Split
Next?Last edited by GRUSTLER; 09-03-2012, 06:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Postall this is irrelevant because you asked me to give you evidence how Bob Arum is physically stalling the fight. Even if Floyd offered him 50/50 of everything the fight would not happen. Example: 6 months for cut to heal and we need to build a stadium. For the record, Floyd back in 09 agreed to 50/50 and Pacquiao went to fight Clottey because he didn't want to take random blood tests too close to the fight. You have the nerve to say Floyd didn't want the fight but disregard all of this actual, documented proof that Arum and Pacquiao not wanting it. Not to mention that the only time Arum and Pac were serious about fighting Mayweather was when he was semi retired TWICE. Get out of here with the Bulls#!t homie.
Pacquiao said himself that he would fight Mayweather on May 5th in the MGM Grand in Vegas had Mayweather offered a fair split of the purse, 50/50 or 45/55 to the winner. Do not quote me again unless you're going to tell me how Arum is physically stalling this fight, or how he is in any way shape or form responsible for Mayweather offering 0% PPV.
Comment
-
None of them had a clear winner someone said? Really lol? I can see the first or even to be generous, the second fight being unclear, but the third? Are you kidding me? JMM CLEARLY won 7-8 rounds of that fight, without a doubt. Anyone who thought Pac won the third fight is either 1- completely ******ed, or 2- a blind Pacfan (well or both lol).
I have no real interest in seeing part four of this because JMM is going to get jobbed again if the fight is in LV. He may have a slim chance of getting his rightful W if it is in California, Texas, NY or Mexico, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Perro View PostNegative, Bob Arum simply suggested that fighting in that stadium would make for bigger profits, he never said Pacquiao will only fight in that stadium, or no fight.
Pacquiao said himself that he would fight Mayweather on May 5th in the MGM Grand in Vegas had Mayweather offered a fair split of the purse, 50/50 or 45/55 to the winner. Do not quote me again unless you're going to tell me how Arum is physically stalling this fight, or how he is in any way shape or form responsible for Mayweather offering 0% PPV.
Comment
Comment