Comments Thread For: Bradley: I Took Pacquiao's Best Punch, Holt Hit Harder!

[littlemac]

I think Manny will win by KO, Bradley has never been in there with any guy that has Pacquiao's power and we've already seen him hurt vs. Holt who is not even a puncher.

[letsgobrady]

Yes, big deal Holt hits 10x or is it 20x harder than Pac? But you know you cant stand there and let pac hit you and have to back peddle, duck, dodge more against Pac than any other fighter, including holt or you will end up like Margarito, hatton, or miguel.
Take your pick.

you may have to duckk and dodge more against pacquiao because he throws more punches in combination than most fighters. bradley fought both holt and pacquiao and bradley was real hurt by holt but never hurt by pacquiao.you can't stand and let holt hit you either or you will be on the floor but thats not the case with manny

[KTFO]

I agree with Timmy's assesstment but it's time to move on and enjoy the "W" that was given to him. By continually making excuses such as his ankles were hurt or watch it with the volume off or trying to downplay Pac's power he's casting doubt about his own conviction that he truly believes he won. You don't hear PAC b*tching and moaning or down playing Bradley, he took the "L" like a professional and moved on. This should be old news for boxing fans.

[Pinoy4ever]

Bradley been hit to many times so he better keep it on the low at the moment.

[hugh grant]

you may have to duckk and dodge more against pacquiao because he throws more punches in combination than most fighters. bradley fought both holt and pacquiao and bradley was real hurt by holt but never hurt by pacquiao.you can't stand and let holt hit you either or you will be on the floor but thats not the case with manny

Bradley was hurt by Pac, we saw it ourselves and Bradley admitted as much. But he dodged and ducked and backpeddled so much that he limited the effects as much as he could.
He only hurt his ankles as a result of having to use his legs more than they are used to.

[A-Wolf]

The exclamation points in the titles are a bit misleading in terms of the emphasis. Makes you think the interview subject was screaming it.

[dde91]

Im glad bradley made his money, never hating on that. But im not even going to argue with nobody about the decision because all of us know deep down who won the fight. On the record it will be bradley, to everybody else it beside the 2 judges was pacquiao. Just my 2 cents. If anybody argues then o'well. I dont take you serious

[marikudo]

It is cast in the records that Tim Bradley beat Manny Pacquiao. 25 years from now people will only go by what the record states. Bradley beat Pacquiao in 2012

25 years from now no one will ever know who bradley was.

[APBrooklyn]

Peace to those who at least slightly agree with me on post # 72...Lets forget the whole Holt thing...theres more important stuff going on with this fight. Not only must the fighter make clean contact but that clean contact should also be noticiably "taking something away" from the fighter getting hit. Effective aggression - ring control - quality of punches (aka "effective clean shots") made this 9 rounds to 3 in my book. Judges were clearly sippin' on some "Bradley Brandy" last sat. night!! Go ANDY LEE!! - take out that cruiserweight bummm cheater chavez jr...lets keep it real and go against ....fighters of the approximate same size shall we???...and NON-Juicing...shall we???....damn... i luv this site haa

[voneric]

Keep talking that nonsense Bradley because you will be forgotten within a year. I think Bradley is starting to realize that he will never get a big fight again and is living this one up. Is really sad when a Grown Man is making excuses like a little girl. If Bradley didnt use the Running Man strategy he would of been KOed.