Bob Arum will pay off the judges or pay off Timmy. There, I said it.

[ShoulderRoll]

So what you're saying is that on one hand they're not picking legitimate threats so Floyd doesn't lose his 0 and doesn't jeopardize megafight with Pacquiao?

Floyd picked the easiest big money fight he could. But Cotto is no longer as dangerous as he used to be. That fight will be one sided.

Bradley on the other hand should be very competitive and can outright beat Manny....if everything is on the up and up.

[Alibata]

I doubt Tim would take the money to take a dive when he is young unbeaten and has his whole career ahead of him including massive paydays if he won.

Maybe a fighter on the downside of their career might cash themselves out but not a guy in Tim's position, like others have mentioned much easier to do it with crooked judging if Arum is to do it.

Sadly this logic would be too much to comprehend for idiotic Floyd loyalists.

[McFearless]

There is no way that he will let Pac lose and jeopardize the largest payday in boxing history against Floyd Mayweather.

It's not good business.

tired of hearing this, if he didnt want to jeopardize the biggest pay day then he would've struck while the iron was hot.

i think even if pac loses he will continue to be a huge draw, its dumb to think if he loses then all of a sudden he will lose his star power

[ShoulderRoll]

I doubt Tim would take the money to take a dive when he is young unbeaten and has his whole career ahead of him including massive paydays if he won.

Arum might dangle a lot of cash in front of him, especially since Mayweather vs. Bradley probably wouldn't be as huge as May vs. Pac.

[Russian Crushin]

List of fighters Arum has paid off

Barrera x2
Morales x2
JMM x3
Solis
Diaz
DLH
Cotto
Clottey
Margarito
Mosley
Bradley
Larios
Velazquez

THERE I SAID IT!!!!

[Cash Cow]

So what you're saying is that on one hand they're not picking legitimate threats so Floyd doesn't lose his 0 and doesn't jeopardize megafight with Pacquiao?

On the other hand Pac is taking on legitimate threats, but paying them off so he doesn't jeopardize his megafight payday vs Floyd?

Please enlighten me with your logic.

When is the last time Pac fought a legitimate threat? Was it the drained Oscar? The Hatton that was already Knocked out vs Mayweather? Was it Cotto at a catchweight? what about Clottey in his turtleshell all night? Naw it was Margarito with no plaster? or possibly a washed up Mosley?....

naw it was the 38 year old Marquez...

[ShoulderRoll]

Does anybody have a link to the video where JMM says that Arum told him it was only business, not personal?

I can't seem to find it on YouTube anymore.

[edgarg]

well the scoring in pacquiao/marquez was pretty suspect, even tho i thought it was a draw, there should have been no 116/112 score card. add that with his comments to mnarqez after the fight, i wouldnt be suprised at all

Yes, Dempsey, you MUST be right, so simple when you point it out... A Harvard trained tax lawyer with 45 years promoting experience is going to tell the fighter who lost that HE'd fixed it that way........ And in the most paranoic public place in the world, on TV yet, so that he'd be certain to be overheard..... Yes Dempsey, you MUST be right......how could it be otherwise......

[UmissUpay]

pac gets no cedit at all

if pac wins its coz arum paid bradley

if pac loses

its coz his a hypejob

dang u guys should should quit watching boxing and just go **** ur head on the wall

[PAC-BOY]

There is no way that he will let Pac lose and jeopardize the largest payday in boxing history against Floyd Mayweather.

It's not good business.

Floyds paying Cotto off! But not for the fight with Manny...because he dont want Cotto to smash his asz