Comments Thread For: Cotto: I Will Not Sacrifice My Body Again For Pacquiao

[-PANDA-]

Cotto went from making no excuses on both of his losses to making excuses on both losses.

But, hopefully he does stay true to this. No need for this fight.

he isnt making excuses...if anything pac is because he agreed to fight clottey and mosley at 147 and margarito at 150 so margarito couldnt use the excuse of being drained seeing as tony attributed his loss against mosley to being weight drained

cotto >150 will have more stamina, power not to mention he has a good trainer rather than one of his best friends who couldnt give him any advise when faced with adversity he didnt anticipate on. from the 5th round on cotto was in survival mode and his punches didnt have anything behind them

not saying cotto will beat pac >150 but he will look much better. hell...he did better against pac than any welterweight did, he busted his eardrum with the little punches he landed

[illwill112]

You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.

Good to see that the mirage that is called Pacquiao is not in control anymore,the wheels coming off now

What truth. Only truth was Cotto got his **** pushed in. *****s at it again.

[Einstien]

WBA junior middleweight champion, Miguel Cotto, has made it clear that he won't fight Manny Pacquiao at the welterweight limit of 147-pounds, where Pacquiao holds the WBO title. When the two boxers fought in 2009, a catch-weight of 145-pounds was mandatory in reaching the deal. Cotto was stopped in the twelfth round of that fight. For the rematch, which has a tentative date of June 9th in Las Vegas, Pacquiao refuses to fight Cotto above 147. This time around, Cotto will not give in. Pacquiao has to fight him at comfortable weight limit.

[Click Here To Read More]

Good For you Cotto!

[ihatebobarum]

Cotto has found his balls. Finally

[Check]

Did I say he said it? Or was my post directed towards posters who are saying he was weight drained?

Go back and read it?

Now is Cotto insinuating that he had trouble making weight or making excuses on the loss by saying "I will not sacrifice my body again..."?

Thanks.

Maybe he did have trouble making weight. How exactly is that an excuse? Stating facts doesn't mean excuse. He isn't saying that is why he lost.

[No-mas-tias]

In the press conference he also said that "money talks", that he'll take the fight that will earn him more money.

[IMDAZED]

While I can't say for sure, I don't know if the weight affected Cotto that much when he and Pacquiao fought last--or was a big part of the outcome. He probably struggled a bit to make it but let's not get carried away here. I do think, however, now that he's been fighting above 150 consistently now, he would really be hurting himself to go below 150. But reading his last line in that article...hey, money talks.

[1dcsailor]

Did he say he was weight drained? Can you point out where if he did, thanks.

****** *******s disn't even read the article. They read the headline and if it's not pro Pacquiao then they get butthurt.

[jrosales13]

Nobody is interested in Pac v Cotto II because the result of the first fight is not even close. At least give us Bradley

If no Floyd-Pac, Pac-Bradley would be damn good.

[Bushbaby]

Did I say he said it? Or was my post directed towards posters who are saying he was weight drained?

Go back and read it?

Now is Cotto insinuating that he had trouble making weight or making excuses on the loss by saying "I will not sacrifice my body again..."?

Thanks.

"I will not sacrifice my body again............", was what he said. "For another fighters benifit". Sounds to me like he was saying he won't be giving Pacman the advantage of having him come back down to welterweight for the rematch.

What does posters saying he was weight drained have to do with what Cotto himself said? He didn't say he was drained. However if Cotto returns to 147 to fight Pacman, which fighter does that benifit?