Bradley vs JMM who wins??

[AlwaysOnTop]

Bradley doesn't have a good jab though...

Hahahahaha

This place attracts more crazy people than Area 51

[dan_cov]

Hahahahaha

This place attracts more crazy people than Area 51

Bradley might do a lot of things well but his jab or lack of is one of his main weaknesses, his jab was disgraceful until an exhibition where he met Tommy Hearns.

Cotto, Floyd have great jabs.
Bradley doesn't.

Dipping left & 'prodding' to the body once or twice does not qualify as having a good jab. His jab is often lazy as hell & left hanging out which has resorted to him being put on his arse on more than one occasion.

[dan_cov]

[carlos djackal]

Bradley would adjust and beats JMM, Bradley has never been beaten and has faced a number of guys who are undefeated and took their "0" away from them. Nobody beats Bradley except for Floyd.

[Jayseen]

oh man.... bradley is all wrong for jmm. really good boxer with great speed, great condition, very smart in the ring, fights great on the inside, keeps his distance really well, combines both to the body and the head, is really strong, great workrate, great chin, the list keeps on going. Marquez may have had great success against pacquiao but we all know pacquiao is a pattern fighter and the boxers that do figure out his style (not saying anyone can) can and will give him problems and might even beat him due to his inability to adjust against really smart boxers. Bradley is just too strong and to me he will just outwork marquez to a UD. im not saying it will not be competitive but Bradley will decisively win.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Marquez knockes him out

Get ya mind rightLOL..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Bradley doesn't have a good jab though...

What are you talking about??Do you even watch Bradley fights??Bradley has a very good jab,everything does not work off of it tho..Like let's say Khan or Alexander,I remember most were saying Alexander had a better jab then Bradley because he uses it more..Who's jab was more effective when they fought??Bradley would make JMM lead(which JMM does not like to do)and take JMM out of his comfort zone..Bradley's tool's are better then most give him credit for...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Bradley might do a lot of things well but his jab or lack of is one of his main weaknesses, his jab was disgraceful until an exhibition where he met Tommy Hearns.

Cotto, Floyd have great jabs.
Bradley doesn't.

Dipping left & 'prodding' to the body once or twice does not qualify as having a good jab. His jab is often lazy as hell & left hanging out which has resorted to him being put on his arse on more than one occasion.

He was only down in a fight against Holt,and I don't know if ya notice,but with every fight Bradley has gotten better...

[ramses07]

Bradley wins it on strength and bc jmm wont be able to hurt bradley.....

it probably wud resemble bradley vs vasquez

[Hougigo]

What are you talking about??Do you even watch Bradley fights??Bradley has a very good jab,everything does not work off of it tho..Like let's say Khan or Alexander,I remember most were saying Alexander had a better jab then Bradley because he uses it more..Who's jab was more effective when they fought??Bradley would make JMM lead(which JMM does not like to do)and take JMM out of his comfort zone..Bradley's tool's are better then most give him credit for...

true.... he'll probably never get the credit he deserves.