Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mark Johnson Rips Pacquiao, Talks Khan-Peterson, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by Brutal Honesty View Post
    all posters have to do is look at your posting history and see that all you do around here is slurp mayweather's balls and hate on pacquiao and you have the audacity to call another poster a fanboy?




    how ironic, a black guy saying how lame to pull a race card. All you ****** black people do is pull the race card when things dont go your way. Martinez and marquez saying that, well if you werent such a narrow minded uneducated miscreant, one could see that marquez has an ax to grind and martinez is angling for a pacquiao fight.
    how ironic an angry white man blaming someone else for his sad lot in life. if you werent such a ball juice drinker you would see that the fight game is full of smoke and mirrors. you ****** clowns always pull the race card when things dont go your way. thats why the ********** party is gang ****ing your silly sheep mentality idiots. so busy are you saying "get that black guy outta the white house" you dont realize laws are being passed that curtail your income streams. wake up moron drop the race baiting and open your eyes. you dont have to be a sheep all your pitiful life.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by drunken_master
      too black? wtf does that even mean? thats like Klitschko saying nodbody can beat me cuz im too white. and he wants a PR/commentating gig?! bwahahahaha PAC will beat the **** out of mark too dumb Johnson back in any era he can pick.
      dude how many times are you going to post the same thing? at least come at it from a different angle.

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by Brutal Honesty View Post
        but you are black..... Are you just gonna lie about those things?
        The assumption that you have made, and are flying with, is hilarious

        I ask you this......

        IF you are wrong, and if I do not even live in the USA, let alone have black skin..... how ****** would that make you look/feel?

        Just saying..... once it was proven that you made a MASSIVE incorrect assumption, why would anybody take you seriously and listen to any points that you made regarding boxing?

        You are an incredibly small-minded little man with no life-skills.

        Get over your racial issues dude, black folks aint scary. The next time you see some black guy sitting alone in a bar, go buy him a drink man, I guarantee that you learn something.

        I am a kiwi, from NZ, we dont get into that racial **** here, because we realise that it is small-minded and completely irrelevant. We got all kinds here, all colors, and thats how we like it.

        The notion of favoring one fighter over another, simply because of his race, is one of the most absurd things that I have ever heard. Ridiculous.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by Steak View Post
          you are a buffoon. Marquez was nowhere near the best at featherweight when Pacquiao beat Barrera, he only had wins over Gainer, Medina and Peden at the time. Thats like a joke compared to Barrera, who had wins over Morales, Hamed, Kevin Kelley and Johnny Tapia. Not to mention you can make a very strong case for Pacquiao beating Marquez in their featherweight fight anyway.

          Sasakul was also the best in the world after beating Yuri Arbachacov, who was better than anyone Mark Johnson beat at Flyweight.

          saying that Barrera 2, Cotto, Hatton, and Ledwaba are not good wins is outrageous, and if you dont consider those meaningful wins then basically nothing is a good win.

          and as for this...
          losing to other fighters doesnt make you **** magically, and Hatton had never lost at JWW anyway The only guy that had a good chance to beat Hatton at 140 was Bradley, Khan wasnt on the scene yet and Witter got dominated by Devon Alexander not long after Hatton got KTFO by Pacquiao.
          I did not say that they were not good wins you ****head, I asked you how beating a guy who would have lost to a number of fighters in his own division could possibly be regarded as great?

          And, I am still waiting for you to answer that question, so whats up ?

          I agree with you, Pac is a good fighter.

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by Brutal Honesty View Post
            but you are black, and all you do is hate on manny and make love to floyd. Are you just gonna lie about those things? Ive criticized both manny and floyd but the mere fact that you dont even give an ounce of credit to pacquiao who was voted fighter of the decade by people who get paid for a living to write and analyze boxing says that you are just trolling and should not be taken seriously. If manny's achievements are crap, then what does that make the achievements of fighters considered lesser than manny?

            ps- i live in a major metropolitan american city and i can safely say some of those most racist people are blacks. Hell they get away with being racist on tv while white people and other ethnicities are held to a higher moral standard.
            are you serious??????? what is the good old boy network??? let me tell you its not comprised of blacks, mexicans,pinoys,or native americans. whites get away with being racist on a very serious level. they make laws that conform to their racist views. if a white man gets caught with a half of kilo of coke, and i get caught with 4 small rocks of coke, i get MANDATORY life in prison. while the white man gets probation and drug awareness training. GTFO with your silly views. a police officer in a southern town was convicted of perjury and sent to jail. well he sent 50 black men to prison(who were all let out) he testified they tried to sell him drugs(he was a uc) he was the only officer to testify and all those innocent men were convicted. until he tried to lie and say a black man,who was actually an FBI agent, tried to sell him drugs. if not for that folly this racist punk would have been able to continue his racist agenda. so dont tell me about who is a racist. you IDIOT. history is laden with examples of racial injustice against **********.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by drunken_master
              too black? wtf does that even mean? thats like Klitschko saying nodbody can beat me cuz im too white. and he wants a PR/commentating gig?! bwahahahaha PAC will beat the **** out of mark too dumb Johnson back in any era he can pick.
              You are dreaming, Pac stayed away for a very good reason.

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by mrjoeblive View Post
                how ironic an angry white man blaming someone else for his sad lot in life. if you werent such a ball juice drinker you would see that the fight game is full of smoke and mirrors. you ****** clowns always pull the race card when things dont go your way. thats why the ********** party is gang ****ing your silly sheep mentality idiots. so busy are you saying "get that black guy outta the white house" you dont realize laws are being passed that curtail your income streams. wake up moron drop the race baiting and open your eyes. you dont have to be a sheep all your pitiful life.
                I am an angry white man, but according to him, today..... I am black

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
                  I did not say that they were not good wins you ****head, I asked you how beating a guy who would have lost to a number of fighters in his own division could possibly be regarded as great?

                  And, I am still waiting for you to answer that question, so whats up ?

                  I agree with you, Pac is a good fighter.
                  Barrera never lost to anyone but Pacquiao at featherweight.
                  Barrera had only lost once controversially at super feathweight
                  Hatton never lost to anyone but Pacquiao at 140
                  Sasakul had beaten everyone he faced at Flyweight
                  Ledwaba hadnt lost in 8 years at Super Bantamweight
                  Cotto only lost to one guy at Welterweight

                  hurry up and show that p4p list.

                  Comment


                    #89
                    brutal honesty continues to slip under the radar from being perma-banned. completely useless cunt this guy. pops in when the opportunity arises to post his usual diatribe, dude is seriously emotionally hurt over blacks. begs me to wonder (for comical value) what traumatizing event that involved a black person in his sad pathetic life to have such ill will from this racist shrimp ****.

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by Steak View Post
                      Barrera never lost to anyone but Pacquiao at featherweight.
                      Barrera had only lost once controversially at super feathweight
                      Hatton never lost to anyone but Pacquiao at 140
                      Sasakul had beaten everyone he faced at Flyweight
                      Ledwaba hadnt lost in 8 years at Super Bantamweight
                      Cotto only lost to one guy at Welterweight

                      hurry up and show that p4p list.
                      steak, i cannot give pac full props for the barrera fight. marco already had 70 fights by the time he got to pac. how much did he have left at that point. had he fought pac when was fresh he would have IMO done to pac what he did to naseem hamed,who hit a helluva lot harder than pac. thats just my view. also i have a big problem with all the in-house fights. in the last 4yrs pac has not fought anyone out side of top rank. you dont think thats a little suspect?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP