Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

we all know Marquez and Floyd fight differently

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #31
    Originally posted by SkyKng View Post
    but it's the manner in which Floyd beat marquez that tells us floyd will win. floyd could have knocked marquez out in round 1.
    He's a 130lb'er brah.....

    Comment

      #32
      i like how since the recent fight, all of a sudden you guys are down playing Pac's past win.
      Cmon guys. He may have missed a lot, but he got the KO anyway.

      Besides, he's not going for points. Hes not going for a UD.

      He goes for the KO.

      Comment

        #33
        Originally posted by Dempsey-Roll View Post
        i like how since the recent fight, all of a sudden you guys are down playing Pac's past win.
        Cmon guys. He may have missed a lot, but he got the KO anyway.

        Besides, he's not going for points. Hes not going for a UD.

        He goes for the KO.
        i agree completely. But for me, theres something lacking in Pacquiao, he's not the killer and mean mother fcuker he was. He seems conservative in his aggression, which bodes well for most guys. But Pacquiao is at his strongest and best when he's unloading combinations or those long straight left hands.

        But thats just my opinion

        Comment

          #34
          Originally posted by The_Golden_Goy View Post
          i agree completely. But for me, theres something lacking in Pacquiao, he's not the killer and mean mother fcuker he was. He seems conservative in his aggression, which bodes well for most guys. But Pacquiao is at his strongest and best when he's unloading combinations or those long straight left hands.

          But thats just my opinion
          yes yes finally another person who sees it!
          I noticed since Pac became p4p king, and moved up to WW, hes not that beast like he was back when he was called the Mexicutioner.
          He may have become more technical, but I think because of it, he's not KOing his opponents anymore, that or he lost the killer instinct and just wants to be nice.

          Either way, if he wants to win against Floyd, he needs to be back to his old self. Or else he'll embarrass himself more than the 3rd JMM fight.

          Comment

            #35
            Originally posted by WESS View Post
            Yeah, Pac was very sloppy. Hatton was complete ****..

            If Pac comes at Floyd like he did Hatton or even JMM, he will will eat counters all night long. Especially when he starts leaping in and swinging away like an amateur.

            Every time Pac will load up and leap in, he will get countered. Mayweather will have him thinking twice before he throws. This will significantly lower his punch output. Pac will end up fighting Floyd's fight and ultimately get embarrassed.
            In that punch sequence, the commentators: And here he comes again, Pacquiao, the combination doing damage to Ricky Hatton!


            That was just comical, he missed every single punch in that combination, and the one that touched Hatton, Hatton was quick enough to put his glove up to block it.

            Comment

              #36
              Originally posted by Dempsey-Roll View Post
              i like how since the recent fight, all of a sudden you guys are down playing Pac's past win.
              Cmon guys. He may have missed a lot, but he got the KO anyway.

              Besides, he's not going for points. Hes not going for a UD.

              He goes for the KO.
              It's not about him missing a lot of punches, we all know Pacquiao is very inaccurate even against guys who stand in front of him. It's about him missing against guys who are not known for their defense. And how he misses, and how he throws his punches at these guys, and how they look like a prime Pernell Whitaker while dodging his punches.

              Comment

                #37
                Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                It's not about him missing a lot of punches, we all know Pacquiao is very inaccurate even against guys who stand in front of him. It's about him missing against guys who are not known for their defense. And how he misses, and how he throws his punches at these guys, and how they look like a prime Pernell Whitaker while dodging his punches.
                do you know of a really accurate aggressor?

                Comment

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Ugh! View Post
                  do you know of a really accurate aggressor?
                  Amir Khan?

                  Comment

                    #39
                    Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                    It's not about him missing a lot of punches, we all know Pacquiao is very inaccurate even against guys who stand in front of him. It's about him missing against guys who are not known for their defense. And how he misses, and how he throws his punches at these guys, and how they look like a prime Pernell Whitaker while dodging his punches.
                    Havent you ever thought that even if those punches misses, it can make the opponent go for a counter punch but as soon as they do, Pac finally lands it on them?

                    Y'know, like setting traps?
                    It maybe a part of a game plan, or it might not.

                    Comment

                      #40
                      bottom line, manny stands no chance---nothing else needs to be said

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP