Foreman vs. Byrd

[Ascended]

As Byrd was no natural Heavyweight, he still had to overperform just to eek by some big men. Heck Holyfield fit HW better than Byrd. While Byrd had a bit of a 2nd teir run as a HW titlist beating Tua, old Holyfield, Oquendo, McCline, Williamson and drawing with Golata, he struggled with the size of Golata, McCline and of course Wlad (where he lost). I can see him frustrating any version of Foreman, but not lasting. I think it would be similar to the Wladimir fight. He will move well, pepper some shots, feel confident, but the hard shots will land and Foreman would eventually break him down.

golata is the man to compare to george not wlad fought nothing like him why you made that comparison no idea

golata had his hands up like george
1 punch at a time
he had that same bad aim unless a person was where he needed them to be
he threw 1 punch at a time

and was almost the same speed but with better defense chris had some trouble with him but he was countered easy mutiple times
golata was a real hw and tough
George wasnt to hard shots

chris wasnt a hard hitter but he would combo when he knew he could he would like i said combo george to a ko

George defense he had none and was more sloopy then golata its easy to see chris makes him look foolish

your pick for george is ****** like you anybody with good vision knows Chris would ko him from accumulated punches


Commentary said in matches that chris would ko a person if they walked in with no defense they said that cause of his great ability to pick shots and land with combos
George had no defense

So no george wouldnt win

[SN!PER]

Ibeabuchi is not a good example to prove Byrd is vulnerable, because Ike was an exceptional fighter.

He could have fought brutal wars against Lennox Lewis and the Klitschko bros. and maybe even changed heavyweight history.

[Ascended]

Ibeabuchi is not a good example to prove Byrd is vulnerable, because Ike was an exceptional fighter.


George was a good fighter but not technically at all while ike was

He could have fought brutal wars against Lennox Lewis and the Klitschko bros. and maybe even changed heavyweight history.

The Ike comparison is beyond odd it always has been Ike fought like more patient ver of mike/wlad

wlad was patient and would throw those jabs from range

Mike would those those wide overhand rights
Mike would explode with hooks often

golata is the man to compare to george

golata had his hands up like george
1 punch at a time
he had that same bad aim unless a person was where he needed them to be
his punch speed was better not much better then Georges
he threw sloopy punches
his punches were loopy

So why their comparing ike to George/golata who andrew was a more advanced ver of george as like I said is odd

Golata did way better then george ever did
anybody with good vision can see george would get hit way more then him

Iike its really strange to pick george when commentary have always said chris liked to fight those big slow guys sloopy guys

chris never lost to 1

George never would beat a young Ali who wasn't as hard to hit as chris so why would chris lose doesnt make sense at all never has

Chris had problems with people who kept range and had decent speed or fast which is why he usually liked to fight the slow dudes like its nothing chris would have to worry about when he would be moving way to much for george

[just the facts]

I agree, Byrd would dominate Foremans clunky soul.

Digging up 15+ year old threads? How pathetic is your life?