Originally posted by asian_sensation
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Andrew Golota to fight March 19th 2005!!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Atwa_66Andrew Golota will fight Lamon Brewster for the WBO Heavyweight title on March 19th, 2005 at Madison Square Garden, New York City. It will be promoted by Don King Productions
Fight Card Includes:
Felix Trinidad vs Ronald Wright
Paul Briggs vs Tomasz Adamek
Lamon Brewster vs Andrew Golota
YES!!!
Best news I have heard in a long time
Can't wait to see this
Hopefully Golota won't be screwed this time
Don't care what anyone says, I want to buy this PPV
.....That is a good card!!! Golota will finally have someone to fight who actually will try to fight him instead of hold him or slap him. I like his chances in this one. If Wlad fights a live body(he is already #2 in the WBO), that could set up a Wlad Golota title fight right after Golota/Brewster. It could make the WBO title fights very interesting in the near future.
Comment
-
Originally posted by asian_sensationI think that King is smart. He built up Golata's public appeal by screwing over Golata in the last 2 fights. Now he's feeding Brewster to Golata to cash in on Golata's new found appeal. And to summon public support for a rematch with Trinidad, they are sending him in with relative easy touch Winky Wright. Paul Briggs in a showcase fight to open up, Don King wins again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by marvdaveWinky Wright..easy touch?....I think not. It will be a very competetive bout. Wright might be boring, but Tito can be outboxed. Ask Oscar...he gave Tito a lesson until he decided to stop fighting the last three rounds. Wright is a very difficult fight for Tito...should be a good one
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atwa_66No, Golota-Brewster is the main event
Titos fight isn't even a belt fight
strange indeed
Comment
-
Originally posted by marvdaveBelts are meaningless. The two best fighters arguably at their weight are fighting. (Tito-Wright) I can't believe Don King would do that to his money man Tito.
strange indeed
Comment
Comment