Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #521
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
    Jab's will count in this fight, and Taylor's jab will win it for him.
    I guess jab's count after all.

    Comment

      #522
      Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
      I guess jab's count after all.
      Who said that they don't?

      Comment

        #523
        Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
        [IMG]//i955.***********.com/albums/ae34/mcbsouth/Screenshot2011-10-27at22756PM.png[/IMG]

        You can close this thread now.
        /thread.

        I remember Jim Lampley commentating on this before Mayweather-Ortiz.

        Comment

          #524
          Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View Post
          /thread.

          I remember Jim Lampley commentating on this before Mayweather-Ortiz.
          That showed % of punched landed to % of punches received.

          This thread was just focused on % of power punches landed.
          Last edited by D4thincarnation; 12-15-2011, 02:43 PM.

          Comment

            #525
            Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
            That showed % of punched landed to % of punches received.

            This thread was just focused on power punches landed.
            So once again, I guess jabs don't count?

            Comment

              #526
              Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
              So once again, I guess jabs don't count?
              Why do you think compubox has a seperate category for jabs?

              Comment

                #527
                Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                That showed % of punched landed to % of punches received.

                This thread was just focused on power punches landed.


                I told you countless times that will not determine accuracy. That chart rightly takes into account total connect percentage.

                Comment

                  #528
                  Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                  Why do you think compubox has a seperate category for jabs?
                  I don't know, let's hear it.

                  Comment

                    #529
                    Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
                    I don't know, let's hear it.
                    I said it countless times before but for your benefit I will say it again.

                    First, a jab is not always thrown to land (a scoring punch). It can be used as a range finder, to open up an opponents guard, apply pressure.

                    An offensive fighter is much more likely to use his jab to create openings, by feints, moving the guard and blinding the opponent with the jab than a fighter that is a counter puncher. Now these punches do there job but compubox counts them as a fail.

                    Also a southpaw fighter will be mostly up against a fighter with the opposite stance, so jab hands are up against each other and cancel each other out.

                    An orthadox fighter will mostly be up against a fighter with the same stance so the jab will be able to find it's target.

                    Comment

                      #530
                      Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View Post


                      I told you countless times that will not determine accuracy. That chart rightly takes into account total connect percentage.
                      Wrong, and the total connect percentage is misleading.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP