Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Mayweather Will Never Make it To Pacquiao

[big_james10]

You are pathetic. This is the first time I heard that Yahoo is more credible than the Ring. So in your book, Yahoo is actually the Bible of Boxing? Since when? And Yahoo.com is even more credible than the BWAA who selected Pacquiao as Boxer of the Decade?

Oh yeah, Floyd is the Boxer of the Decade. Ndou, Bruselles, Corley, Mitchell, Baldomir. Floyd fought them all in short order. Of course, according to Yahoo.com these are the best boxers at the time Floyd fought them? LOL.

For your information, there is only ONE Boxer of the Decade and his name is not Floyd Mayweather, Jr. but Manny Pacquiao.Better shut down your trap or I may say not post at all if it only shows you're an idiot.

I know you and the other Pac worshippers on this site don't have the intellectual capacity to answer this question, but I will ask it anyway. How can the boxing media name Pacquiao fighter of the decade when Mayweather was named Fighter of the Year by ESPN three times in the decade between 2001 and 2010 (two of those times he was competing directly against Pacquaio) compared to one time in that decade for Pac (when Mayweather was retired)? Also, Floyd was named RING ****zine Fighter of the Year one time during that decade. Yet, the geniuses who write for these two publications along with all the other nitwits who call themselves boxing writers choose to name Pac Fighter of the Decade. This would make about as much sense as basketball writers naming the Houston Rockets the 1990s team of the decade for winning two NBA titles and ignoring the Chicago Bulls, who won six titles during the decade.


This FOTD award was a case or pure bias. It doesn't mean a damn thing except to *******s, who have nothing else to hang their hat on while worshipping a fighter who has consistently fought the least threatening opponent he can find for the last four years.

The truth is the award should have gone to Bernard Hopkins. Second place should have gone to Floyd Mayweather. Pac shouldn't have been listed in the top five.

[Pullcounter]

Ortiz is gonna get out boxed.

[Wapacman]

I know you and the other Pac worshippers on this site don't have the intellectual capacity to answer this question, but I will ask it anyway. How can the boxing media name Pacquiao fighter of the decade when Mayweather was named Fighter of the Year by ESPN three times in the decade between 2001 and 2010 (two of those times he was competing directly against Pacquaio) compared to one time in that decade for Pac (when Mayweather was retired)? Also, Floyd was named RING ****zine Fighter of the Year one time during that decade. Yet, the geniuses who write for these two publications along with all the other nitwits who call themselves boxing writers choose to name Pac Fighter of the Decade. This would make about as much sense as basketball writers naming the Houston Rockets the 1990s team of the decade for winning two NBA titles and ignoring the Chicago Bulls, who won six titles during the decade.


This FOTD award was a case or pure bias. It doesn't mean a damn thing except to *******s, who have nothing else to hang their hat on while worshipping a fighter who has consistently fought the least threatening opponent he can find for the last four years.

The truth is the award should have gone to Bernard Hopkins. Second place should have gone to Floyd Mayweather. Pac shouldn't have been listed in the top five.

Very good points!!

[LeadUppercut]

I know you and the other Pac worshippers on this site don't have the intellectual capacity to answer this question, but I will ask it anyway. How can the boxing media name Pacquiao fighter of the decade when Mayweather was named Fighter of the Year by ESPN three times in the decade between 2001 and 2010 (two of those times he was competing directly against Pacquaio) compared to one time in that decade for Pac (when Mayweather was retired)? Also, Floyd was named RING ****zine Fighter of the Year one time during that decade. Yet, the geniuses who write for these two publications along with all the other nitwits who call themselves boxing writers choose to name Pac Fighter of the Decade. This would make about as much sense as basketball writers naming the Houston Rockets the 1990s team of the decade for winning two NBA titles and ignoring the Chicago Bulls, who won six titles during the decade.

This FOTD award was a case or pure bias. It doesn't mean a damn thing except to *******s, who have nothing else to hang their hat on while worshipping a fighter who has consistently fought the least threatening opponent he can find for the last four years.

The truth is the award should have gone to Bernard Hopkins. Second place should have gone to Floyd Mayweather. Pac shouldn't have been listed in the top five.

Pac has been given break, after break, after break, both by the media, and by the boxing community in general. Not that casual fans like tatangb45 would have noticed that.

Who cares what the fawning media state.

They are full of ****, and just re-print the current Manny-dribble.

Pacquiao has a manufactured resume', Marquez, Martinez, Ward, are all above him on a real list.

Why the *** would a P4P champion require a catch-weight ?

Keep it up, man. You're really showing everyone what you're made of... good job!

[bongalbal]

in your dreams:-)

this shows you that floyd is only fighting good fights..he is the man..the best p4p..no catch weight fraud fights no leftovers ..he's the real deal and this is what we want...arum and duckqiao have been trying to kill the sport with their cherry picking but floyd is here to save boxing.

in your dreams:-)

[Left Hook Tua]

they also said hatton, JMM, and mosley would beat floyd.

DUH...... all were golden boy fighters.

as is floyd pretty much.

plus hatton and jmm were big underdogs (as is victor now)

when you have a fight were most expect one to win you have to hype up the underdog's chances.

[bongalbal]

Nice that GB at least shows confidence, albeit false confidence in their fighter. Ortiz doesn't stand a chance against PBF. But this is still a good fight for him. No shame in him losing and he should learn a thing or 2 from the fight.

Floyd got no legs anymore, it will be like jose luis castillo all over again but this time with power to knock floyd out. remember he scored knock downs to maidana at 140, imagine at 147. and this is the 1st knockdown in berto's last 9 fight. this time floyd picked the wrong person.

[bongalbal]

I know you and the other Pac worshippers on this site don't have the intellectual capacity to answer this question, but I will ask it anyway. How can the boxing media name Pacquiao fighter of the decade when Mayweather was named Fighter of the Year by ESPN three times in the decade between 2001 and 2010 (two of those times he was competing directly against Pacquaio) compared to one time in that decade for Pac (when Mayweather was retired)? Also, Floyd was named RING ****zine Fighter of the Year one time during that decade. Yet, the geniuses who write for these two publications along with all the other nitwits who call themselves boxing writers choose to name Pac Fighter of the Decade. This would make about as much sense as basketball writers naming the Houston Rockets the 1990s team of the decade for winning two NBA titles and ignoring the Chicago Bulls, who won six titles during the decade.


This FOTD award was a case or pure bias. It doesn't mean a damn thing except to *******s, who have nothing else to hang their hat on while worshipping a fighter who has consistently fought the least threatening opponent he can find for the last four years.

The truth is the award should have gone to Bernard Hopkins. Second place should have gone to Floyd Mayweather. Pac shouldn't have been listed in the top five.

ESPN also named Floyd "COWARD of the DECADE" the next day:-)

[tatangb45]

Pac has been given break, after break, after break, both by the media, and by the boxing community in general. Not that casual fans like tatangb45 would have noticed that.

Sock it to them, guys! The media, BWAA, Ring ****zine, all the boxing organizations and the "boxing community in general", they don't know nothing about boxing. It's just one big conspiracy to sabotage Floyd. Why can't people see that?
Keep up the good work, guys. Show the world what kind of stuff you're made of!

[ronnie_N.]

good stuff from a banker... but you know, he's a banker...