it makes no sense at all when posters uses the words "taking of the soul" in their arguments when posting. this is only a cliche, words used by reporters trying to be poetic in their writings. posters seems to be fascinated with these words that they uses it to described a fighter defeating another ending the losers career with finality. to some a fighters losing in a fight is also losing his right to fight again, losing his credibility. i cant remember if there is a time in the past when this fighters circumstance was even thought of, its only now. and from i first heard that? you tell me, who was telling everyone that he's not fighting this fighter and hes greater because so and so fighter already lost to other fighters? then posters appearing discrediting wins by other fighter over another because his "SOUL WAS ALREADY TAKEN BY ANOTHER" when he was defeated. thats a lot of bull****, it makes no sense at all. when you use that in your argument, to me you are not a poster but a POSER.
Comment