Barrera: is he just a big puss-puss?

[Sweat]

I disagree. If you saw the Velasquez fight.

What finished the man was a right hook. Not the deadly left one.

PAC and his trainers said that power is not diminished and it only needs adjustment. PAC has adjusted well enough in several months. Now he's ready to fight at 130 now. Then later beat MAB's ass into retirement back at 126.

I can only imagine when PAC goes back to 126. lol! MAB with his brains popping out. lol!

ya, but I'm comparing Pacquiao's power when he was a 126 pounder and 130 pounder. His power in 126 is just amazing but he lost some of it going up to 130. just my opinion.

[Pak men]

I disagree on this one. MAB has been an elite boxer for a long time. He has a good record but every elite fighter has moments like Barrera-Pacquiao or Pacquiao-Morales. That's just boxing. You have to give and take.

I disagree also pal. History recognizes only one elite in an era. In the era of the 3 M and one PAC. Only one of them will emerge as the elite and in the end the losers will be the measuring stick with which that elite will be set against.

It's a harsh reality, but that's what history does. Only the best is remembered and the rest discarded.

[Pak men]

What does fighting Velasquez have to do with anyone else?

Please.

And the idea behind this was......Pac Jockeys are ripping on M.A.B. for defending his title against a quality opponent.

They also are glorifying Pac's victory over a complete bum.

NAH! Kid, you're not making any sense. What about COWARD MAB fighting PAC again. lol!

Of course I understand MAB does not want to retire in a wheelchair. lol!

[Sweat]

What does fighting Velasquez have to do with anyone else?

Please.

And the idea behind this was......Pac Jockeys are ripping on M.A.B. for defending his title against a quality opponent.

They also are glorifying Pac's victory over a complete bum.

A complete bum??? are u serious? thats funny.

[Run]

A complete bum??? are u serious? thats funny.

Name a quality opponent Velasquez beat.



| |

[Pak men]

Name a quality opponent Velasquez beat.

The point is, noobs are noobs. Noobs like Peden, Fana and Velasquez are mere practice. You don't huff and puff against these noobs. You don't rest against these noobs. You destroy them.

You're really funny. You're trying to avoid the argument. lol!

[Run]

You're really funny. You're trying to avoid the argument. lol!

LOOK AT WHAT YOU JUST TYPED.

You are the one avoiding the arguements. Are you an alias or soemething?

"Point is" "Point is"

"Kid"

you are a waste of bandwidth in the form of boxing ignorance.



| |

[Sweat]

I disagree also pal. History recognizes only one elite in an era. In the era of the 3 M and one PAC. Only one of them will emerge as the elite and in the end the losers will be the measuring stick with which that elite will be set against.

It's a harsh reality, but that's what history does. Only the best is remembered and the rest discarded.

and history will recognize Barrera and Morales better than Pac because they fought better oppositions. I mean, Pacquiao is my favorite boxer right now but when youre talking about who's gonna be remembered, I would say Barrera or Morales will. Right now, Pacquiao is recognized by most boxing fans because he beat Barrera. But he has to beat Morales and Marquez and other great fighters if he wants to go on the same level like Morales or Barrera. He has yet to prove A LOT of things in my opinion.

[Run]

The point is, noobs are noobs. Noobs like Peden, Fana and Velasquez are mere practice. You don't huff and puff against these noobs. You don't rest against these noobs. You destroy them.

You're really funny. You're trying to avoid the argument. lol!

You stated earlier that Elite fighters

DONT FIGHT NOOBS.

You need to quit contradicting yourself junior.



| |

[Pak men]

LOOK AT WHAT YOU JUST TYPED.

You are the one avoiding the arguements. Are you an alias or soemething?

"Point is" "Point is"

"Kid"

you are a waste of bandwidth in the form of boxing ignorance.

hahaha. Why did you avoid my first paragraph. PLs answer that first. You are avoiding this argument kid. PLs answer this first