<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So... Morales was shot to pieces when Manny fought him!?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by mikemurni View Post
    What do you mean. It was specified in the contract. And Morales exercised it.

    MAB-Pac fight wasnt a waste of time because MAB was coming out of a series of victories after his loss with Pac including the win against Morales. He was ranked #4 in the P4P list. So there is a legit discussion to have a MAB-Pac rematch after Pac defeated Morales in their 2nd fight.

    But then Morales exercised the rights for a third fight, then Pac signing 2 contracts, and then Marquez beating MAB, which made the MAB-Pac rematch insignificant.
    Exactly in the bold, waste of time. Shouldn't of happened.

    Just like the 3rd Morales fight.

    As a Pac fan is OK to admitted.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
      Exactly in the bold, waste of time. Shouldn't of happened.

      Just like the 3rd Morales fight.

      As a Pac fan is OK to admitted.
      The third Morales fight was not Pac's fault.

      My point is that MAB-Pac rematch was not a waste of time when it was in discussion the first time (after the Morales-Pac rematch). But I agree it was a waste of time when it actually happened.
      Last edited by mikemurni; 04-10-2011, 11:43 AM.

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by mikemurni View Post
        The third Morales fight was not Pac's fault.

        My point is that MAB-Pac rematch was not a waste of time when it was in discussion the first time (after the Morales-Pac rematch). But I agree it was a waste of time when it actually happened.
        And, that is what I referring to.

        It was a waste of time just like the 3rd Morales fight.

        2 garbage as fights that should not have happened.

        He should of fought Joan Guzman or Humberto Soto around this time.

        *sigh*
        Last edited by jrosales13; 04-10-2011, 11:52 AM.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
          And, that is what I refferring to.

          It was a waste of time just like the 3rd Morales fight.

          2 garbage as fights that should not have happened.

          He should of fought Joan Guzman or Humberto Soto around this time.

          *sigh*
          Excatly, I am in agreement with you on both counts. I am just explaining why there is a 3rd fight.

          Soto and Guzman were good fights but they were not money fights like Morales, EM, and Marquez. Pac a needed a popular side B to compliment his popularity to boost up the PPV buys. And he can only get that by fighting MAB, EM, JMM. He couldnt headline a PPV on his own at that time.

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by Cuauhtli02 View Post
            your sig just shows how much of a pacquiao nuthugger you are. First of all, morales had a hard time making weight the second time around, he wanted a catchweight and was denied it. Even hbo analysts were saying how bad morales looked physically during the pre fight build ups.

            BUT after about 5-6 rounds, those same HBO analysts were saying Morales looked good and perhaps 130 was too high for the smaller Manny. The reason is that at that point Morales was taking control of the fight and was headed for victory, IF it continued that way.

            Not long after the HBO commentators said that, Manny had a huge round in which changed the momentum completely.

            As for denying a catch-weight, they were fighting for a 130 (limit) division title.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
              *******s are seriously dumb sons of b!tches
              ^^^^^^^^^

              The fookin' site idiot accusing somebody else of being dumb. I almost sharted my pants reading Mannie Phresh (dumbest member of BS) post.

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Vegan101 View Post
                ^^^^^^^^^

                The fookin' site idiot accusing somebody else of being dumb. I almost sharted my pants reading Mannie Phresh (dumbest member of BS) post.
                funny coming from you.

                I checked your post history. you have NO posts that arent about Pac or Floyd.

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by Marcelo ♡ View Post
                  funny coming from you.

                  I checked your post history. you have NO posts that arent about Pac or Floyd.
                  You mad ERIK

                  Comment


                    #89
                    People seem to forget that Pac was the underdog going to the second fight. And Pac was considered too small at 130, and was being encouraged to move back down at 126.

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Respect to two ATG's..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP