Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pac fights shot,past prime etc fighters

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by miron_lang View Post
    Yeah a lot can happen in a year.

    I agree with him though. I know someone who beat the mother of his kids, almost hit an ex-employee intentionally with his car, poked a guard in the face, etc and all this just happened within 12 months so yeah it can happen.

    His handle is a misnomer though, "realtruth"? darn, it should be realturd..

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by [KLTP] View Post
      All because you're on top of a P4P list(ESPECIALLY A RING ****ZINE POPULARITY CONTEST) doesn't mean you're fighting the best of the best, and that somehow deserve credit for it. There's so many factors other than rankings.

      For example, Floyd beat Marquez, the number 2 P4P fighter when he fought him, he got no credit(and rightfully so) because Marquez had to move up 12 pounds to fight him.
      Marquez NEVER deserved a #2 ranking. 7-10 would have been more accurate. Or even 15.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TheRealTruth321 View Post
        Your a lier... plain and simple... You are saying things like 'so and so was good in 2008, and in 2009 Pac killed him' duuuh thats a year later... alot can happen in a year.

        ****** ass thread with no purpose.

        Ohhh in 1971 SSM was killer... pacs fighting him in 2011 so he must be GOD.



        i so hate your mom

        Comment


          #14
          Morales wasn't in the Top 10 P4P when Pacqiuao beat him I believe.

          However, the rest all were and are all excellent wins.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
            Morales wasn't in the Top 10 P4P when Pacqiuao beat him I believe.

            However, the rest all were and are all excellent wins.
            He was TOP 10 end of 2005 and his fight with Pac was January 2006





            I would admit that Morales III almost did not offer much resistance but go in there and try to get a KO(He balooned to 160 to 170lbs before fight III). but the Morales that lost to Raheem and Pac II were pretty much the same version of Pac I. Watch the Raheem fight. its the same Morales that seeks and try to engage in fact he chase Raheem all night. but Raheem is an excellent runner, Stick and run run run, stick and run.


            Morales is now the reigning WBC Silver light welterweight champion of the world.

            Alfaro and Lorenzo were Good wins for the come backing Morales.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Chups View Post
              Look at this dumb assh0le. Read b1tch.


              Red K this fuck!
              bytches make me laugh. sitdown bytch.
              Laugh at this fuck!

              Comment


                #17
                I find it EXTREMELY unlikely that Morales was still in the p4p lists after being embarressingly beaten one sidedly by Zahir Raheem....unless they made Raheem a p4p fighter too?

                Barrera is still Pacquiao's best win, and Cotto and Hatton are both very good wins as well.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
                  I find it EXTREMELY unlikely that Morales was still in the p4p lists after being embarressingly beaten one sidedly by Zahir Raheem....unless they made Raheem a p4p fighter too?
                  I vividly remember Morales keeping his P4P status even with the loss, reason being he ventured a higher weightclass.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
                    I find it EXTREMELY unlikely that Morales was still in the p4p lists after being embarressingly beaten one sidedly by Zahir Raheem....unless they made Raheem a p4p fighter too?

                    Barrera is still Pacquiao's best win, and Cotto and Hatton are both very good wins as well.




                    Morales was still ranked.


                    Yeah the fight was actually one sided but its not like he took a Gatti like beating from Raheem

                    He was the aggressor the whole fight. Raheem ran all night. Land something and go bike over and over. Horrible style matchup for Erik's mentality.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by miron_lang View Post



                      Morales was still ranked.


                      Yeah the fight was actually one sided but its not like he took a Gatti like beating from Raheem

                      He was the aggressor the whole fight. Raheem ran all night. Land something and go bike over and over. Horrible style matchup for Erik's mentality.
                      I was there live at the Staples Center and I thought Morales won....everyone was shocked that he lost. I didn't watch it again so I don't know if I missed anything.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP