Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

All pacs rankings remain the same, first time they have ever done this before despite their being many worse robberies they have ignored

Thoughts???

What are you talking about? They have their own scorers at fights and if they feel the fighter was robbed they won't change their position. One example is, when Lara beat Paul Williams and was robbed. Lara was still ranked above Paul Williams despite having the L in his record. Same thing with Abril-Rios, even tho they took Rios out of the LW rankings.

[Bermuda]

ever since Goldenboy bought the ring they been trying to over compensate to not look biased from Cotto being #1 Jr WW after beating Foreman and Mayorga to Pacquiao being #1 WW with out fighting any top WW since Cotto in 09 and Donaire being so overrated in P4P list and so on

Ring is no more credible then any of the ABC organization hell they scored the last two fights to Marquez and still kept Pacquiao rating the same

well clottey was ranked #5 i think best ww and people thought he beat cotto..and believe it or not but mosley was like ranked #3 or #2 ww (because floyd was still on "vacation") i think during the time pac fought him.

[crold1]

Incorrect. Lara was ranked above Williams despite the loss.

This. Ring has done this many times when their whole staff disagrees and the d is universally decried. Right call.

[Earl-Hickey]

They have been updated u ****ing mongs there's a rankings update link on the front ****ing page you blind ****s

[CHOWWOKKA]

yea new rankings haven't come out yet. it clearly says last updated May 28. Idiot

But they have Pacquiao at 4 losses

[crold1]

But they have Pacquiao at 4 losses

They often fail to change that date. It's updated with an article on it.

[whirlwind]

The butt hurting begins. Good decision The Ring.

[Porter's Dad]

Why should the Ring acknowledge and legitimise such a farce?

Decisions are in danger of becoming like titles; just devalued to the point where I'm starting to think......why are we even giving a f-ck anymore about what 3 individuals who are heavily influenced state a result to be.

With titles, no-one really cares, we just want good fighters to duke it out. With decisions, it may be that if we continue on this trend, people might just say....well, they don't matter either, we just want good fighters to duke it out.

It would obviously be a bad situation but if the people in charge of boxing continue the neglect and short-termism, this is where we are heading.

[al-Xander]

So this is Ward talking. Not a casual fan, a Pac tard or a Marquez/Floyd Jr hater. What's the problem?

Normally, I would agree with this, but I'd prefer that the belt stays with Bradley. I like him having the burden of defending it not necessarily against Pacman but against Khan, Ortiz, Guerrero and Marquez. Since Marquez 4 will be Pac's next likely fight, Bradley had to make a choice among the fighters mentioned. Unfortunately, they're all GBP guys. That's the problem.

[GG Magic]

This is pretty debatable to be honest.

I agree with the Ring's decision on this one since it really was a horrible decision and this is near unanimous.

But now where do they draw the line? What if there is a similar robbery for other fighters? Will they do the same?