Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[D4thincarnation]

Hopkins vs Taylor I [Hopkins wins]

Close fight but I think that was the fair decision.

[Phenom]

Not for televised fights that can be seen by anyone, it don't take a genius to count.

You might find it difficult though.

lol at these Pacfans you guys never seize to amaze yeah we can all count in slow motion but see landed punches/half blocked are open to interpretation and Compubox is notorious for having inaccurate power punches stats so unless you want fights to be scored to who ever throws more which is the only thing we could double check and agree on then compubox is just as ****** as using Lederman score card

[D4thincarnation]

Devon Alexander vs. Andriy Kotelnik [Kotelnik wins]

Another robbery overturned by compubox.

Just think how much better boxing would be if we were using a compubox system.

Make the change, for the good of boxing.

[Phenom]

they did that for 1 rd on a thread on here earlier.

It still caused arguments with people saying punches landed that werent counted. btw the "revised" compubox stats for that rd had Bradley landing more than Pac.

Besides, punches landing doesnt determine who won a fight. And if it does end up that way, expect an end of KOs with fighters concentrating on touching each other as many times as possible with their gloves instead of using power

exactly there is no way in hell Pacquiao landed 50% against Mosley no ****ing way

[gingeralbino]

exactly there is no way in hell Pacquiao landed 50% against Mosley no ****ing way

as i said on another thread i reckon the 2 guys doing compubox are Lampley and Lederman. It would explain some of the ridiculous numbers it comes up with at times

[CHOWWOKKA]

I don't think TS knows how to score a fight

[Marvellous1]

FirePunch, I'm not sure if you understand, but relying on Compubox more heavily than "common sense" or interpretation is what the TS is advocating. Merely looking at numbers (which are ironically based on two humans' interpretation), pure data over the the existing scoring criteria (you know, punches landed, effective aggression, defence, ring generalship....) and, if I understand the notion, changing the result at a later date upon further analysis if necessary. So where do multiple knockdowns come into it if you are ultimately outlanded? What if a fighter lands more punches in less rounds but is outlanded in the majority of rounds fought? I'm interested in your opinion on these things... minus the condescending tone, if you will.

[D4thincarnation]

Too many so called fans seem to be happy with robberies, fixes, fans being cheated and the slow death of boxing.

I am not, the current system is not working.

When something doesn't work you replace it.

A compubox based system would eliminate corruption and robberies.

If you are against it, you are for fights being fixed, boxers being robbed, fans being cheated and the death of boxing.

[D4thincarnation]

FirePunch, I'm not sure if you understand, but relying on Compubox more heavily than "common sense" or interpretation is what the TS is advocating. Merely looking at numbers (which are ironically based on two humans' interpretation), pure data over the the existing scoring criteria (you know, punches landed, effective aggression, defence, ring generalship....) and, if I understand the notion, changing the result at a later date upon further analysis if necessary. So where do multiple knockdowns come into it if you are ultimately outlanded? What if a fighter lands more punches in less rounds but is outlanded in the majority of rounds fought? I'm interested in your opinion on these things... minus the condescending tone, if you will.

It would not purely be a straight punches landed system, it needs to be tweaked, but even in its most simplest form it is superior to our current system

[Russian Crushin]

Why should they? People watch the fight as fans; drunk, excited, anxious etc. there's naturally a greater margin for error the first time around.

What error for margin? I think you mean biased. Being drunk is gonna make you score the fight just for Pac?

The first time you watch the fight is your best bet, not after reading the forums of everyone's opinions and then watching it