Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[ßringer]

Ford has been a terrible judge for over 10 years now, it's time we tossed him in the recycle bin.

[Salardo]

LOL at Bradley being "SLICK"

u mean when a guy shows slickness his whole career, wins 7 world title fights against top opponents, never lost a fight, and is regarded one of the best pound4pound fighters in the world for YEARS, then he is "not slick"? let me see your explanation: u watch how Pacquiao makes Bradley look average and not slick at all and now you think Bradley is a bum? only a complete fool would think that. it just shows how good Pacquiao is, and not how bad Bradley is. If you see a guy like Eddie Chambers get smashed by Klitschko, it doesnt mean Chambers is the biggest bum in the world, it just means Klitschko is too good for him. And Im not comparing Chambers to Bradley now cause Bradley is better than Chambers.

[joseph5620]

That's the part I don't get. You don't earn points for ineffective aggression. And it seemed to be Bradley was in control of the pace and distance, whether backing up or coming forward.

Exactly. I see credit for that much to often.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Ok on the night of the fight I had Pac winning by 3 rds..I really thought it was a clear win for Pac..I was trying not to listen to the commentary by HBO,but I won't lie it got to me and effected the way I scored the fight...Not to mention I had guest in my house..They were all telling me I was crazy for even giving Bradley the rds that I did...At the end I won't lie I was shocked..Like I said I had Pac winning by 3 rds the night of...

Now on my rewatch,I watch this fight on the TR feed the second time around(side note they were way better then the HBO crew)they were not as bias..I truly thought it was a great fight..That could be 7-5 either way,I gave the fight to Bradley on second watch..I just thought he did more in most of the rds..There were times were Pac would not do anything until 40 secs left in the rd..I have to say I can't give a fighter a rd who has taking off most of it and trys to steal it at the last sec...I will say Pac landed the more eye poping shots..Bradley worked more imo..I could see anyone having this fight 7-5 Pac or 7-5 Bradley or even 6-6 even..This was not a robbery or a blowout,it was a close fight that imo Bradley won...

[viperz007]

True,we should get a 25 yr old,who is most likely going to swayed by a big name,then an older more experience guy who's been here before..You make loads of sense..

maybe he meant they should get someone that bob doesnt know his bank account #

[NoLove]

I admit Pac vs JMM was controversial, it was close.
Now Brad vs Pac, was daylight or robbery, there is a clear difference that dont need explaining.

Marquez wasnt close. Marquez beat him as clear as night follows day.

[devildg]

Bradley couldnt handle the speed and power. He is a good fighter but Pac's physical gifts are on another level.

I think its the same way with Khan. Khan is not technically better, but he may be faster and a better athlete. I always feel that is sometimes enough and that certainly applies to someone like Pacquiao.

Skills dont always pay the bills.

[brick wall]

i don't get these dramatic changes in somebody's score from 1st viewing to 2nd or 3rd. i also don't get how commentating could easily affect your score...that's ******ity.

[Khalid X]

Why would Marquez fans be happy?

Pac vs JMM won't be happening which means that Marquez probably will be retiring.

I said it once and I'll say it again......JMM is the biggest loser in this whole fiasco.

[Salardo]

Bradley couldnt handle the speed and power. He is a good fighter but Pac's physical gifts are on another level.

I think its the same way with Khan. Khan is not technically better, but he may be faster and a better athlete.

Skills dont always pay the bills.

its not just speed and power. Pacquiao is also deadly accurate and anticipates movements of his opponents. if he wouldnt have that ability he wouldnt land his punches.