Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[Russian Crushin]

I cant lie, I was screaming robbery lst night, but I am rewaching the fight right now, and there is a VERY GOOD case in saying that Tim Bradley won the first 3 rounds.

I thought he won the 1st by boxing and because PAc didnt do too much until the last 10 seconds of the round.

In the 2nd round, yes Pac landed 4 more shots, and was 19 of 39 or something, but Bradley landed 15 of 72. He nearly doubled the output, and was the busier fighter, and let off a few little flurries.

Now the 3rd round, I think think Bradley went in there and won almost the entire round. In the last 20-30 seconds or so, Pac did land some good punches, but I dont they were enough to negate the first 2:40 of the round.

Round 4 was the first round Pacquiao won, where the round was not even close.

Did you re-watch it in slo mo 3D?

[BoxingFollower]

Soo...Technically Bradley is P4P number 1 or 2 right?

He did Beat Pacman..and just like Roach said....Judges are barely wrong when the Marquez scandal was going on.

[kiaba360]

Bradley hands down won the last 3 rounds.

I felt he won the first round also.

That's 4 rounds right there.

I thought Bradley decisively won rounds 8-9.

It's Pac's fault. He clearly had the fight won going into round 8.

Once Bradley adjusted and got Pac's timing down, that allowed Tim to counter Pac's first jab which normally set up Pac's straight left.

Fact of the matter is, once Bradley found out how to take away Pac's straight left (the only punch that hurt Tim), it was all downhill from there.

Pac couldn't even get off from rounds 8-12 because as soon as Pac would go to throw the double jab straight left combination, Bradley was throwing combo's after Pac's first jab.

Go back and watch the fight without the HBO commentary and listen to the crowd.

That was a pro Pac crowd last night. Why were they so quiet from rounds 7-12??? Bradley was obviously doing something right that's why.

It was a draw, I don't think Bradley won, but it was a draw.

I had Bradley winning rounds 1/6/8/10/12.

What's bothering me the most is that the Pro-Bradley cards gave him round 5, which I felt was a decisive Pac round where he had Bradley stunned.

[Always]

Did you re-watch it in slo mo 3D?

Hahaha... Naw


Im not saying that he won the first 3 rounds, but I can understand why someof the judges and some people watching would have given him those rounds.

I think I would say it is 2-2 after 4.

[boricuajr23]

no. even if I was to give him somewhat credit for this win, he isnt jumping Ward, Klitschko, Martinez, Donaire & Marquez that easily in my book.

[4Corners]

Even though Bradley did much better then 2nd half of the fight, I had Pac winning 117-111.

Round 1 was close. Bradley controlled most of the round with his jab, boxed Manny, and had some nice combo's. Pac landed 2 left hands at the end of the round though, which made it close.

Pac won rounds 2-6 very clearly, had some big rounds where he out landed Bradley at will. After rounds 2 and 3 where Bradley tried to exchange with Manny and got tagged, I'm not sure why he still decided to keep doing that until the last 3 rounds of the fight.

Pac also won rounds 7 and 8, though they seemed more competitive, I just don't think Bradley did enough to win those rounds, and Pac out landed him pretty significantly.

Round 9 was close. This was the most effective Bradley was at trading with Manny, though Manny still had his moments too. Very close round, could have gone either way.

Round 10 went to Bradley. This seemed, to me at least, was when Bradley really started to box more in the center of the ring, seemed less willing to trade with Manny, and countered like he should have all night long. Bradley won the 10th clearly.

Round 11 was close as well, didn't feel Bradley did enough to win it though. It seemed like this round was a prime example of Manny taking off the first 1:30-2:00 of the round, but closing the roung stronger. Round 11 went to Manny, though it was competitive and sort of close.

Round 12 was a bradley round. Again, he was less willing to trade with Pac like he did in rounds 2-9, and chose to box more like he did int he first round, and the two rounds prior to this one. Thought he out boxed Manny in the 12th.

I had it 117-111 giving Bradley rounds 1, 10, and 12. The 9th was really a close round, and the 11th was competitive but a Manny round. No one should have had it wider than 118-110, as Bradley clearly won 2 rounds, but no one should really have it closer than 116-112 for Pac. We'll see a rematch anyway, and Bob Arum is going to laugh all the way to the bank.

What really disgusted me aside from Pac getting "robbed" was the bias announcing from Jim Lampley. He made it sound like it was 11-1 or 12-0, and was all over Pac's nuts. When Cotto clearly won rounds 6 and 8, with round 9 being close, and having a competitive round 5, he straight up said Floyd lost 4 rounds in a row, which wasn't the case. And he acted like the fight was up in the air at the end. It's pretty clear that Lampley is Pro-Manny to the fullest, and that's fine, but at least try to hide it when being an announcer.

[Jam Jars]

P4P is opinion based so he can be wherever you want him to be.

[-PBP-]

Here's the scores for what its worth:

[NEETzsche]

bradley gave a great account of himself, and i gave him 5 rounds, but i find it impossible to score the fight in his favour. the rounds pacquiao won in the middle of the fight were decisively won, bradley has no case for them at all.

[Mister Wolf]

Hahaha... Naw


Im not saying that he won the first 3 rounds, but I can understand why someof the judges and some people watching would have given him those rounds.

I think I would say it is 2-2 after 4.

Its different when you are ringside looking at the fight and not watching on T.v