Originally posted by socialteach
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Unseen View PostChavez is superior to Camacho, he is a top 2 latino boxer.
Barrera again is superior to Hamed skill wise and intelligence. Barrera isn;t even slow.
Paulie has no power nor a right hand and Cotto is clearly the better fighter. Cotto at 140 wasn't slow.
I get what you mean that not speed alone, that is true but Pac holds a lot of other advantages too, particularly power.
Bradley is good, everything is good about him from chin to speed, but he isn't great.
lol, you get what I mean though.
I'm not even saying speed isn't a good thing. I'm just pointing out, it's not the end all, be all.
I know those dudes are skillful but they obviously aren't the faster man in those contests.
Comment
-
Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Postlol, you get what I mean though.
I'm not even saying speed isn't a good thing. I'm just pointing out, it's not the end all, be all.
I know those dudes are skillful but they obviously aren't the faster man in those contests.
Comment
-
-
They may not have been in their best weight but both Benitez and Duran were proven WW's when Leonard beat them.
Both were also ranked #1 at WW when he beat them. As was Tommy Hearns.
Duran ranked #1, Benitez ranked #1 and Tommy Hearns ranked #1 and he beat all 3.
So I'd say yes, his place is more than justified.
Comment
Comment