Originally posted by Eaner0919
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which win is more impressive, Mayweather vs Corrales or Pacquiao vs Barrera 1?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Akhi View Post
Chico had power and a huge size advantage. Mayweather embarrassed and stopped him.
How is beating a harder opponent in better fashion not more impressive?
If you say it like that, then you should also count Margarito as a more impressive win for Pacquiao which is most definitely not his best win.
Winning against a bigger and a harder hitting opponent does get you a good win but it is the measure of the overall skill of the fighter that should be looked upon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Akhi View PostMayweather-Corrales was a boxing clinic and a beautiful performance, showing the superiority of Mayweather over his opponent.
Morales/Barrera-Pacquaio was two unskilled brawlers who lead with their chin flailing wild shots with no regard for defense.
PBF-Chico.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxer2k5 View Postwhoever called barerra or morales or whatever unskilled brawler is crazy.
but i pick pbf beating coralles. even when barerra fought morales the boxing world
was saying he was done and finished and thats what 2 3 years before manny fought him.
barerra wasnt in his prime he jsut had a couple classic battles with morales and strung together some big wins. he did what gatti did before he fought mayweather. built it but when he fought manny he got blitzed. a great win and comming out party for manny but far from the best of barerra. he still had technical skills but this wasnt prime barerra. to say a prime barerra would beat manny i dont think so i still think manny has a style to beat marco. but still wasnt the best barerra.
but the coralles loyd fought was undefeated knocking everyone out bigger skilled and looked to possibly giving the champion his first lost. floyd was barely touched and made coralles look like nothing in that fight. and to show it was all floyd chico would still go on and do big and great things years and countless fights after that floyd lose even winning one of the greatest fights ever.
Comment
-
EM and MAB were very skilled. Don't what the he'll dudes are talking about. But when PAC fought MAB HR wasn't in his prime.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gino Ross View Postidiot!!!then pac wins in landslide...... pac has more ko/tkos than floyd who had become feather-fisted coz his only work out is massaging ellerbes balls........
Anyways, I have to go with Pac over Barrera because Barrera was just a better fighter than Chico. And LOL at those who said he wasn't skilled. Floyd's performance against Chico was the best I've seen out of him. I mean, the guy put on a boxing show. In the end, both were wonderful performances.
Comment
-
Pac vs Barrera was wayyy more impressive. Barrer was a proven P4P and a hall of famer..Chico was overrated. didnt prove anything in his career. undefeated doesnt mean anything..specially with Chico's resume when he fought Floyd was garbage. you can hate all you want but Pac vs Barrera was more impressive specially the way Pac won the fight.
Comment
Comment